User talk:1scruffy1

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Saint Boniface, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. "According to popular belief...": his tomb is in Fulda. There is no contradictory authority stating otherwise. Moreover, Boniface didn't attempt to propagate Christianity, he did propagate Christianity, for forty years. Drmies (talk) 04:22, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cantal (cheese), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cantal (cheese) was changed by 1scruffy1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.935157 on 2010-12-04T20:24:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:24, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Morganatic marriage. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 16:39, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Remington Model 870. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Warning for repeated (three times...) addition of unsourced material. Material that is also totally out of scope. Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 10:30, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Remington 870 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 21:45, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:1scruffy1 reported by User:Thomas.W (Result: ). Thank you. Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 21:50, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Typhoid fever may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* Doctor John H. Watson battle with enteric fever before meeting S. Holmes [[Study in Scarlet]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]