User talk:213.74.186.109/Archive 1

Archive 1

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:12, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as talk:Rojava are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Editor abcdef (talk) 04:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Abusive "POV" flagging and edit-warring about it by 213.74.186.109

I have now reported the abusive "POV" flagging and edit-warring about it by 213.74.186.109. -- 2A1ZA (talk) 13:29, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to talk:Armenian Genocide. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Editor abcdef (talk) 08:55, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi Editor abcdef (talk), I wonder why you were five days late in warning me of the above matter? I find it hard to believe it was a coincidance. An evil intention hides behind your "civil" facade. No problem. Thank you. -213.74.186.109 (talk) 05:24, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Yavuz Sultan Selim (Third) Bridge, Istanbul.jpg is obviously copied from some website. It has been nominated for deletion as such. Please do not add it to articles. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 08:05, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

I didn't know it was copied from a website. It was sent to me by another user. Thanks for the info. -213.74.186.109 (talk) 07:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Syrian Democratic Forces shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Editor abcdef (talk) 11:03, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Why can't editing be simple? -213.74.186.109 (talk) 07:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at talk:Mosul offensive (2016), you may be blocked from editing. Editor abcdef (talk) 11:22, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Editor abcdef (talk), I have taken your advice, took out the personal parts and added some info. What part of my input do you find disruptive? -213.74.186.109 (talk) 12:59, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 2A1ZA (talk) 10:00, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Your comments seem to be uncivil

User 213.74.186.109 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), can you explain your comments at [1] ? To me this seems a violation of WP:CIV. 2003:77:4F0C:9A16:B9F1:5AA8:B1A7:37E9 (talk) 10:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 2003:77:4F0C:9A16:B9F1:5AA8:B1A7:37E9 (talk) 15:21, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Disruptive editing on the article Rojava conflict

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rojava conflict. Your edits appear to constitute disruptive editing and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated disruptive editing can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 2003:77:4F19:1A82:91D0:A27B:A2E5:7343 (talk) 08:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Disruptive editing on the article People's Protection Units

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at People's Protection Units. Your edits appear to constitute disruptive editing and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated disruptive editing can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 2003:77:4F1C:7D46:B8E7:AAFB:7CB3:FC51 (talk) 10:49, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 2003:77:4F41:7727:D94C:F64A:76EB:5C86 (talk) 17:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Articles about the Syrian Civil War are covered by sanctions

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

EdJohnston (talk) 15:16, 17 December 2016 (UTC)