User talk:21bkyonseieng

Welcome!

Hi 21bkyonseieng! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:21, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Young-Oak Lee moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Young-Oak Lee, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:22, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have moved this back to the draft space, because there is too much content that isn't supported by references, with entire paragraphs without a single citation. Please note that every material statement must be referenced to a reliable source; this is true of all articles, and especially ones on living people, per WP:BLP. (And while on the subject of referencing, per WP:IBID please do not use 'ibid', as it isn't clear what it refers to; use named references instead, see WP:NAMEDREFS.)

Secondly, the sources cited are primary, and therefore unable to establish notability, and there isn't anything in the draft that would obviously seem to make this person inherently notable per WP:NACADEMIC. You need to either add secondary sources to establish notability by WP:GNG, or clearly demonstrate what special notability criterion is met.

Once you have made these improvements and feel the draft is ready, you can send it to pre-publication review by clicking that blue 'submit' button. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:31, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Cho Han Haejoang

Your recent item has been moved to draftspace; it is not ready for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please develop in draftspace and submit for review when ready. Please review the guide to article creation, the manual of style and the guide to adding sources. Please do not move to mainspace without completing the review procedure or it may be deleted. Would also suggest looking at other articles to see how they are laid out and structured. Eagleash (talk) 02:59, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Chin-woo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kim Chin-woo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Star Mississippi 02:37, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use your sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Please wait for another reviewer and do not move articles directly into mainspace. You are not experienced enough to understand what is required for an article to remain. Star Mississippi 02:39, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jong-sook Lee moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jong-sook Lee, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources and appears to be copy/pasted from somewhere. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page and wait for someone else to review it. Star Mississippi 02:41, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jong-sook Lee (September 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jong-sook Lee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 16:49, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 21bkyonseieng! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 16:49, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cho Han Haejoang moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cho Han Haejoang, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:36, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cho Han Haejoang (September 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This has been. moved back to Draft. It appears from the page logs that this may not be the first time. Please do not move it unilaterally to mainspace again. It requires proper referencing

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cho Han Haejoang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:38, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paik Nak-chung moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Paik Nak-chung, is not suitable as written to remain published. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page and wait for an uninvolved editor to weigh in. Star Mississippi 01:07, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for repeatedly moving and inappropriately creating articles.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 01:09, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/21bkyonseieng. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

-- RoySmith (talk) 23:45, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seol Jungsik (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fifthapril was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seol Jungsik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fifthapril (talk) 13:47, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paik Nak-chung (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Some of the content is unreferenced, and some sources cited are non-reliable. Also, using "ibid" is not recommended, as it is unclear and subject to break if/when content is changed or moved around. Please use named references instead (see WP:NAMEDREF).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paik Nak-chung and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:31, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:O Hwa-seop

Hello, 21bkyonseieng. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:O Hwa-seop, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:00, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Yeo Seok-ki

Hello, 21bkyonseieng. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yeo Seok-ki, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:O Hwa-seop

Hello, 21bkyonseieng. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "O Hwa-seop".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:47, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jong-sook Lee

Hello, 21bkyonseieng. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jong-sook Lee, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yeo Seok-ki

Hello, 21bkyonseieng. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yeo Seok-ki".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:11, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jong-sook Lee

Hello, 21bkyonseieng. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jong-sook Lee".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:07, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kim Chin-woo

Hello, 21bkyonseieng. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kim Chin-woo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cho Han Haejoang

Hello, 21bkyonseieng. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cho Han Haejoang, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kim Chin-woo

Hello, 21bkyonseieng. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kim Chin-woo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:36, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Seol Jungsik

Hello, 21bkyonseieng. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seol Jungsik, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:42, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Paik Nak-chung

Hello, 21bkyonseieng. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paik Nak-chung, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Paik Nak-chung

Hello, 21bkyonseieng. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paik Nak-chung".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:32, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]