User talk:24.151.94.26

March 2014

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to G. Hannelius, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:57, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jeffrey Tambor may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| [[WordGirl""

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:36, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gilbert Gottfried may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[WordGirl]]: Beau Handsome and Uncle Larry (2012-2013

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:11, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to G. Hannelius. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:11, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wizards of Waverly Place

Please stop adding a separate column for Wizards on Deck with Hannah Montana at Wizards of Waverly Place.[1][2] Wizards on Deck with Hannah Montana was not a separate season, it was a crossover episode from the second season, for which there is already a clumn within the cast list. --AussieLegend (✉) 19:27, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to The Suite Life of Zack & Cody. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 18:04, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Marriageable age, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 03:45, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ages of consent in South America. I'm seeing a pattern of what looks like sneaky vandalism. Edits that introduce incorrect information, but it looks plausible so it either gets reverted without a warning, or it gets missed. Meters (talk) 03:56, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:34, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for inserting factual errors, as you did at Marriagable age. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:51, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of Jessie episodes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 16:40, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of Jessie episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AussieLegend (✉) 16:50, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The changes that you are making to the article are, as I indicated in my edit summary, not sourced, nor are they supported by the existing source, which is authoritative. As such, your changes constitute original research, which is not permitted. The changes also contravene Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Capital letters. Please do not continue to make these changes without providing sources for your changes and complying with the Manual of Style. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:53, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Jessie episodes. As before. Info you are adding directly conflicts with existing references in article. Find a better reference if you are going to change info. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:08, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for repeated addition of unsourced content, contrary to Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:22, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

V.L. v. E.L.

FYI, you recently edited this article to say that Justice Kennedy wrote a unanimous opinion for the Court. I reverted your edits because the Court actually released a per curiam opinion. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 20:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to United States gubernatorial elections, 2018, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.