User talk:2603:7000:4600:358A:72EF:92A0:CA76:7CCB

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! --Malerooster (talk) 03:12, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks Malerooster! I went with the anonymous because I wanted mods to be sure when I made edits and it stores my IP iirc?

I am having maybe a possible edit war? Genetic studies on Jews

I hesitate to call it that yet, but the topic is a toxic one that touches on what the Nazis did as well as other forms of institutionalized bigotry. I saw others made edits to the article to discredit it and as a healthcare worker with experience in genetics I figured I'd bring my own resources to the article as well as include those prior ones. It appears the originators of the article, or whomever, are opposed to edits which discredited their article. I included citations from the Human Genome Project, American Society on Human Genetics, and World Health Organization as well as the Holocaust Museum and the Postdam Conference etc. Look, I don't agree with the article and it was identified as antisemitism by the prior references, but I understand that this is a hot topic so all I wanted to do was add a section which goes through the controversy. I am trying my best but it does feel like there is an unfairness to it when I can't even cite the HGP or anything in relation to an article about genetics.

If someone better than me wanted to clean up the wording or something but make the same points/same citations then I am fine with that. My goal here is to provide the entire scope of the situation and I might not be handling it well but I am trying so I am hoping you'll understand this is all in good faith. 2603:7000:4600:358A:72EF:92A0:CA76:7CCB (talk) 04:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Genetic studies on Jews

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Genetic studies on Jews, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:37, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Andre🚐 21:10, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.