Adventure Time edits
Hello, I notice, you keep adding Goliad, but the link that you provide as "evidence" does not mention at all that Goliad will be back; it's merely Adam Muto rhetorically reiterating what the person wanted. Goliad is already mentioned under Bubblegum's section. Furthermore, Goliad appears in only ONE episode. It is not a recurring/minor character. It was a one-off character, unlike the rest of the characters on the list. Please kindly stop adding this to the character list.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 00:54, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
- Category:But Goliad is way better than Princess Bubblegum snd both Goliad and Stormo need to be seen again and Princess Bubblegum needs to die.
This is starting up again. Please stop adding Goliad to the AT characters list. She has only appeared in one episode, and is therefore a one-note and non-recurring character. If she returns in a future episode, add her then. But as for right now, kindly cease and desist.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 20:28, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
- Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:22, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not sure, but since CN hasn't announced anything about Goliad returning, I'm going to guess no.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:33, 8 May 2013 (UTC)/Maybe they're keeping Goliad's return as a surprise? Don't forget how Mr Muto hinted her return,http://www.formspring.me/MrMuto/q/416093207235940513.
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruptive editing continues on List of Adventure Time characters. Thank you. TBrandley 20:44, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Adventure Time characters, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The next time you restore Goliad, a sub-minor character, you will be reported to Administrator's Noticeboard/Edit Warring for repeating the same action when it has been explained to you that we work by consensus and currently the consensus is that the character does not belong in the list. Attempts to explain and to start discussions on the talk page have failed with you refusing to take part. This is not a laughing matter and being brought to the Adminstrators attention twice in a little over 5 days is not the best way to make an impression. Hasteur (talk) 21:02, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Edit war on List of Adventure Time characters
While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and edit wars may be slow-moving, spanning weeks or months. Edit wars are not limited to 24 hours.
If you are unclear how to resolve a content dispute, please see dispute resolution. You are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus.
If you feel your edits might qualify as one of the small list of exceptions, please apply them with caution and ensure that anyone looking at your edits will come to the same conclusion. If you are uncertain, seek clarification before continuing. Quite a few editors have found themselves blocked for misunderstanding and/or misapplying these exceptions. Often times, requesting page protection or a sockppuppet investigation is a much better course of action.
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is More Adventure Time vandalism. Thank you. Hasteur (talk) 04:51, 29 March 2013 (UTC)