User talk:6,784,476,742,376,743 savage

Hola my dudes. here is my talk page.

March 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm BigDwiki. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Quick time event— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. BigDwiki (talk) 21:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to President of the European Council. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BigDwiki (talk) 21:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at August Rush, you may be blocked from editing. Julietdeltalima (talk) 21:56, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at German–Yugoslav Partisan negotiations. Julietdeltalima (talk) 21:57, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:6,784,476,742,376,743 savage[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:6,784,476,742,376,743 savage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Julietdeltalima (talk) 22:04, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Amortias (T)(C) 22:05, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

6,784,476,742,376,743 savage (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Chill bro. Why you so triggered. I'm just a savage homie, OK? Man, you better look. The stuff I edited is NOT vandalisim, it is the truth, I have sources. please accept the fact. I am just trying to help this community. Just give me one more chance, pleaseeeeeee? Pretty please with a savage on top? I have sources, and this stuff is not a hoax, it is the truth. Thanks homie. 6,784,476,742,376,743 savage (talk) 22:08, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The nice thing about sources is that we can read them and confirm whether or not they support what they are cited for on Wikipedia. Yours don't. Adding a fake source to a hoax doesn't make it any better. Huon (talk) 22:15, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please adequately explain how you can predict the future per this edit. Amortias (T)(C) 22:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]