User talk:64.189.18.19
January 2024
[edit] Hello, I'm 1AmNobody24. I noticed that you recently removed content from Henry Clinton (British Army officer, born 1730) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Nobody (talk) 07:28, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Parliament of Ireland. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:46, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Bronx River, you may be blocked from editing. Nobody (talk) 07:55, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Received Pronunciation. TheEpTic (talk) 17:38, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
March 2024
[edit] Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Buenos Aires, you may be blocked from editing. Annh07 (talk) 07:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The "fictional" city, as you called it, of San Pablo is the actual city of São Paulo. In Spanish, the language of the source you're disputing, it's called that. Largoplazo (talk) 12:45, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- oh i heard of sao paulo just not spanish version. Thank you, 64.189.18.19 (talk) 00:25, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Bernie Moreno. Nick Levine (talk) 06:40, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
![Stop icon with clock](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/39/Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Donald Albury 11:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC)- wwhat did I vanzlaize? I don't get it. 64.189.18.19 (talk) 16:56, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- You removed the name of an editor from a citation to a book. That in itself, if it had been the first mistake you made, would not have resulted in you being blocked. However, you have been warned several times to stop removing content and maintenance templates from articles, and you did not heed those warnings. If you want to be able to edit again, please read and follow the quideline at Wikipedia:Appealing a block. Donald Albury 18:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- I can't add my reaosn to be unblocked which I don't rmember rmeoving an editor's name from the citation. I don't habe an account andd prevously it wasn't valdnalismn but remoinv dubous text that awas makred as not having a ciation and rmeoivn gdelte aritcle when he is a condiate for sneaotr i dont ahve an account so ic ant add my reaons tot he apge,. 64.189.18.19 (talk) 18:38, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- This edit, where you changed
Cook and Cook
toCook
in the citation to the book Discovery and Conquest of Peru, edited by (Noble David) Cook and (Alexandra Parma) Cook. Donald Albury 19:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC)- oh it hpgut it ws just supsoed to beone 64.189.18.19 (talk) 19:20, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'm reading that as "Oh, I thought it was just supposed to be one". You also disputed the source that mention San Pablo, and removed an assertion attributed to it, because, since you hadn't heard of it (by that name), you assumed that it didn't exist. As you can see, once you're able to edit again, it will be a good idea to get into the practice of verifying your assumptions before you edit. Largoplazo (talk) 23:44, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- oh it hpgut it ws just supsoed to beone 64.189.18.19 (talk) 19:20, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- This edit, where you changed
- I can't add my reaosn to be unblocked which I don't rmember rmeoving an editor's name from the citation. I don't habe an account andd prevously it wasn't valdnalismn but remoinv dubous text that awas makred as not having a ciation and rmeoivn gdelte aritcle when he is a condiate for sneaotr i dont ahve an account so ic ant add my reaons tot he apge,. 64.189.18.19 (talk) 18:38, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- You removed the name of an editor from a citation to a book. That in itself, if it had been the first mistake you made, would not have resulted in you being blocked. However, you have been warned several times to stop removing content and maintenance templates from articles, and you did not heed those warnings. If you want to be able to edit again, please read and follow the quideline at Wikipedia:Appealing a block. Donald Albury 18:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
![]() | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |