Jump to content

User talk:70.187.171.236

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Focke-Wulf S 1 (March 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ashleyyoursmile were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ashleyyoursmile! 08:58, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 70.187.171.236! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ashleyyoursmile! 08:58, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vickers Type C (March 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jenyire2 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Jenyire2 20:32, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siemens-Halske Sh.II (March 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jenyire2 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Jenyire2 20:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

[edit]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Extrapolaris. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 21:15, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
I'm using an IP address, and I did not make the edits above.70.187.171.236 (talk) 21:19, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]
Yet you signed your name as "Vahe Demirjian", the same name User:Convariety did at the SPI. So clearly you're the same person. I'm sorry, but blocked users are not permitted to edit Wikipedia in any way, including from an IP address. There are ways to be able to unblock your original account, and edit again legitimately, but it takes time, and you have to follow the rules and not edit in the meantime. You make good edits, and create needed articles. So wait at least six months, and then ask to be unblocked on User talk:Extrapolaris at that time. I'll support your unblock if you don't edit at all, including on IPs, for six months. BilCat (talk) 21:38, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 05:09, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

plicit 01:28, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]