User talk:75.172.195.50

January 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ElKevbo (talk) 03:06, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 14:03, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Edit war on "Big Tech" article

Can you explain why you are repeatedly reverting my edits to the Big Tech article on Talk:Big Tech? -- RobLa (talk) 16:30, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

I'd like to add a comment to this. He also made an edit to that page, changing a list ordered by market cap (where Microsoft were second) to an alphabetical list (where Microsoft were last) on the basis that (quoting directly from his edit comment) Microsoft are not "renowned", in his high and mighty opinion, and furthermore, "no one wants to work at Microsoft". I don't think I've seen such fucking idiocy in a long time. Of course there is nothing wrong with an alphabetised list necessarily. It's just the reasoning that is so phenomenally fucking stupid that I don't know what to say. CyclingFan1234 (talk) 17:57, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

---