User talk:84.26.41.112

May 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ionian Sea. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dr. K. 19:07, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2018

Hello, I'm Dan Koehl. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Epirus— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Dan Koehl (talk) 16:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, How doesn't a german historic map of the time appear to be constructive? What edits shall I do to that? Thank you

I am re-asking, A german\french map of the same period, showing the demographics of the time, HOW IS THIS NOT CONSTRUCTIVE????!!! What the hell is wrong with everyone?? Gosh!

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Ionian Sea. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dr. K. 17:12, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Ionian Sea. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Dr. K. 17:13, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Epameinondas Charisiadis. Dr. K. 17:16, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You Nationalistic retards, who the heck do you think you are to tell me you will be blocked?? Who deleted sourced content?? I can also write about Greece and cite an article about maths, and a greek editor might revert it, this does not mean that he is deleting SOURCED content you retards. I am removing it for th elast time as it is malsourced and it does not state anything anywhere in the source about what was written there. If you block me, this will have legal consequences and we will see who will have to pay for reparations. Just try and let;s see. Cheers

Moreover, if you keep on lying, I am going to block you from editing. The etymology in Albanian had a source, whether the gayreeks, sorry greeks like it or not. IT will be quotes AND AS LONG AS IT STATES AN ACADEMIC SOURCE IT STAYS THERE WITHOUT ANY DOUBT, AND NORTHEN EPIRUS GOES DUE TO MALCITATION. TRY AND BLOCK ME AND YOU WILL SEE.THAT IS ALL I GOT TO SAY. CHEERS

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Luk ^talk 17:57, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Katie^talk 21:32, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.