User talk:87.76.255.37

April 2024

Hello, I'm JeffSpaceman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 6000 (number) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. JeffSpaceman (talk) 17:06, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 1000 (number). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ïvana (talk) 17:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at 100,000, you may be blocked from editing. Certes (talk) 23:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at 100,000‎. Please do not add original research such as newly invented types of prime to Wikipedia articles. Also, changing "highest" to "largest" does not aid understanding. Certes (talk) 19:37, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

when talking about numbers and their sequences, using the word "highest" is even worse than swearing 87.76.255.37 (talk) 11:11, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

there are 22 Acid-Notation primes: 272011, 278149, 279443, 296027, 331391, 338141, 385321, 386051, 392809, 401119, 409523, 426527, 442097, 466951, 469811, 477671, 497719, 533053, 576179, 707797, 707801 and 707933. 87.76.255.37 (talk) 11:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such thing as an "Acid-Notation prime". (If you disagree, please provide a reliable source showing that they are mathematically significant and not something you made up.) There may be 22 prime numbers which coincide with serial numbers of that artist's work on Newgrounds or elsewhere, but this is original research, synthesis and not notable, so it is not suitable material for adding to Wikipedia. When your block expires, please do not resume adding these factoids, or you are very likely to receive an even longer block. Certes (talk) 11:26, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

these are prime numbers that were IDs of Acid-Notation's songs on Newgrounds, so they can be considered Acid-Notation primes 87.76.255.37 (talk) 09:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prime numbers I personally find interesting are Certes primes, but they have no mathematical properties and are just something I made up one day, so they have no place in Wikipedia. Acid-Notation primes fall into the same category. Certes (talk) 20:55, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

and what are your "Certes primes"? call me all of them 87.76.255.37 (talk) 07:27, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2, 3 and 5. I just made them up. They're as valid as Acid-Notation primes, so they won't be going into any Wikipedia articles. Certes (talk) 13:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

also, i want the OEIS sequence A385321 to be about "Acid-Notation primes" that i made up because 385321 is an Acid-Notation prime 87.76.255.37 (talk) 06:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for clarifying that you made this concept up. We have a clear guideline that Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Sequence numbers are allocated by OEIS, but I suspect that they have a similar approach to non-mathematical inventions. Certes (talk) 13:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

not about "Acid-Notation primes", but there are some non-mathematical and non-existent "Chronamut primes" that have some mathematical properties: 6143 and 6911 are "Chronamut primes" that are also Thabit numbers of kind 2^m*3^n±1; also 6521 and 6761 are "Chronamut primes" that are also Sophie Germain primes 87.76.255.37 (talk) 07:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OEIS sequence A390151 should be about "Waterflame primes" with no mathematical properties since 390151 is a Waterflame prime, check out [1] 87.76.255.37 (talk) 18:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

do you agree with me that 385321 is an Acid-Notation prime? please make the OEIS sequence A385321 about Acid-Notation primes 87.76.255.37 (talk) 16:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

write the first 6 Fibonacci numbers in descending order (13, 8, 5, 3, 2, 1), concatenate them into a single number (1385321), then remove the first digit, and you get 385321, and 385321 is an Acid-Notation prime! 87.76.255.37 (talk) 14:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 20:47, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.