User talk:88.245.194.181

Hello, I'm Egsan Bacon. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Egsan Bacon (talk) 02:53, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

If you take two minutes, you can see that 2 3 editors are running a campaign on purpose. this is a complete blind loop. We cannot enter data because they have blocked us. you say "you can go and contribute". but they do not allow it. review the history of the page. they reject and delete resources. but they cite an interview done a week ago as a source. I am not threatening. just stop these malicious people. You can see that they are just making propaganda by reading the page history.

June 2021

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Orange Mike | Talk 03:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Help me!

We cannot make any changes because the page is protected.Our questions are not answered in the discussion section of the page. Even an interview made 2 weeks ago can be cited as a source.Black propaganda is constantly being carried out by one person. only anti-Turkish sources are added.I will give you a few examples.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_War_of_Independence#Influence_on_Nazis ""Nazilere göre Atatürk'ün başarısının en önemli nedeni Ermenilerin yok edilmesiydi"". Agos (in Turkish). Retrieved 16 June 2021. [110] This newspaper is an Armenian propaganda newspaper.

In this newspaper, the article of anti-Turkish writers of Armenian origin was cited as a source. Gündoğan, Kazım (4 June 2021). "Osmanlı ve Türkiye'de Yahudiler". gazeteduvar (in Turkish). Retrieved 8 June 2021.[64] none of them are historical documents and are just propaganda comments.

this causes wikipedia to be abused.This information is constantly being added by an editor without anyone responding in the conversation section. With the comments just 1 day ago or 2 weeks ago, this propaganda continues. please stop this. 88.245.194.181 (talk) 22:37, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

If I were you, I'd initiate a discussion about these (as you claim) "anti-Turkish" sources at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. If there's a consensus there that the sources are indeed what you say they are, it should be fairly easy to get them, as well as any spurious claims they're used to support, removed from the article(s) in question. To learn more about resolving content disagreements, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. 78.28.44.31 (talk) 23:28, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this with the editor(s) in question, and after reaching a consensus, one of you may make the changes, if any are needed, to the article. They may bring different points of view to the table. Edit requests are how you would suggest non-controversial changes, such as typo fixes, to protected pages. You may also want to find other, reliable sources to add into the article, and as the editor above mentioned, dispute resolution is another alternative. A quick search of the source you mentioned, Agos, shows it of having an "independent" alignment with no mention of propaganda. Are there any specific sentences which resemble propaganda? TGHL ↗ 🍁 23:38, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

You can find out that it is an Armenian newspaper in a very simple way. This is an ethnic newspaper. a judgment is made on the basis of only the comments made in an undocumented manner.It is a newspaper that has never been with the Turks. It is a newspaper with only 4000 sales figures and serving a certain Armenian audience.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.245.194.181 (talk) 23:53, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

The article for the newspaper, while poorly sourced, does say it is independent and bilingual – a quick trip to their website does show the default language as Turkish, reporting on events within Turkey. And the countries do neighbour each other so there is expected to be some overlap in content. To address your initial concern, however, it is recommended that you take this up with a specific editor on their talk page, or provide a particular unverifiable or non-neutral statement in the article. TGHL ↗ 🍁 00:08, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

DS Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

—A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Jéské Couriano} 23:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

---