User talk:97.80.233.19

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saschaporsche (talk • contribs) 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Lima Group

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. --Jamez42 (talk) 19:42, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lima Group

Your recent editing history at Lima Group shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Jamez42 (talk) 16:32, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive behavior

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. --Jamez42 (talk) 20:26, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts

I have also noticed that you have engaged in reverts in the same article of the Spanish Wikipedia. Please provide references to support your edits or discuss the changes in the talk page. This is your last warning. --Jamez42 (talk) 20:27, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

block

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

97.80.233.19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

97.80.233.19 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Fachosalparedon". The reason given for Fachosalparedon's block is: " Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. ".

Blocking administrator: JJMC89 (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Auto-block works as intended. Favonian (talk) 18:04, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

97.80.233.19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Did not know the name was banned. I assume whoever is reading this does not know it is the name of a favorite small bookstore of my youth in my native province, but whatever, I can change the name if it is offensive

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only, please log into your account and request unblock from it.331dot (talk) 15:27, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.