User talk:98.200.8.248

May 2021

Hello, I'm RG067. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Micros Systems—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. RG067 (talk) 05:11, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Micros Systems. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Micros Systems was changed by 98.200.8.248 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.926919 on 2021-05-17T05:16:26+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:16, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well gee Rog, I'm not sure anyone's interested in Micros employing hackers to reuse code that's supposed to be out of date and unlicensed.

You're certainly not interested. Okay bro.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Micros Systems, you may be blocked from editing. RG067 (talk) 05:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Micros Systems. RG067 (talk) 05:30, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your additions are completely inappropriate. This is a formal encyclopedia, not a personal blog. Stop. Laplorfill (talk) 05:50, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're a guy that edits wikipedia. I'm a guy who has submitted code that this company uses. By all means, why should people not be made aware of this company cheating? I'll give you the floor now.

Once more, this is an encyclopedia. We require that additions are properly sourced from reliable sources. Your personal anecdotes are not reliable sources in any way. You are clearly here to push an agenda, not build a neutral, well-sourced encyclopedia. Laplorfill (talk) 05:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. I'll provide the code. You fuss about the words, and I'll fuss about integrity. Unbelievable.

No, you haven't taken the time to read the linked policies, have you. The code is useless, please do not attempt to add code to the article. You will need a published, third-party, reliable source that supports the claims you are making. This is absolutely about the integrity of the article - Wikipedia reports what reliable third party sources have written about a subject. Nothing more. Your attempts to use Wikipedia to promote your own agenda are antithetical to that goal and are not permitted. Laplorfill (talk) 06:03, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ha!, I don't need to show the code that I wrote, that this company uses, that proves this company steals and cheats. I need a third party person to say, a word? a kind, friendly word? an analytical word? A beatiful word?

Do you know how... never mind.

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is 98.200.8.248 claim to engage in criminal activity. Thank you. SunDawn (talk) 06:32, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SQL ^{Query me!} 06:49, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.