User talk:ATuschinski

Welcome!

Hello, ATuschinski, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 22:03, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For your amazing contributions to Hugo Niebeling TheQ Editor (talk) 20:48, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Menschenliebe (film) was accepted

Menschenliebe (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

James^x12345 11:01, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HollowDateTuschinskiPosterFilm.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HollowDateTuschinskiPosterFilm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HollywoodReelIndependentFilmFestivalLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HollywoodReelIndependentFilmFestivalLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hollywood Reel Independent Film Festival for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hollywood Reel Independent Film Festival, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hollywood Reel Independent Film Festival until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Tomas Kurth

Hello, ATuschinski,

Thank you for creating Tomas Kurth.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

A well constructed article but there is very little evidence of real notability here. I don't see significant pieces on him in high quality independent national (or international) sources. It is mostly connected sources or lower grade source and blogs. If you could post the best WP:3REFS on the talk page, I could have a look at them. thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Aszx5000 (talk) 20:30, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ATuschinski, as you have disclosed a WP:COI with the subject, you should refrain from an further edits to the article. You make suggestions on the Talk Page, but you should directly edit Tomas Kurth. thanks. Aszx5000 (talk) 20:43, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tomas Kurth moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Tomas Kurth. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. S0091 (talk) 14:54, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi ATuschinski. Thank you for your work on Constantin Ritter von Tuschinski. Another editor, Scope creep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Could do with proper cites for the works section. Add them as references, ensure they have an oclc field from worldcat and ref tag from the ends. It creates nice cleanly formatted citations. Great article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 18:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep: thank you very much for the kind words, which I appreciate very much, and for your helpful suggestions which I gladly incorporated.

Today, I respectfully ask you for your advice and opinion. An editor named Axad12 today marked the articles about Constantin and Demeter Ritter von Tuschinski with a COI, as I'm their descendant (which I always openly state). He did not name issue with the articles' contents, and I am confident I write about my ancestors, who passed away before I was born, in a neutral way. He told me on his talk page I must not make further edits to those articles, as I am related, and that I from now on must not write about anything related to Austrian/Romanian history that involves my ancestors in any way. To me, this was shocking. He told me he'd nominate my account for being blocked if I keep editing such pages - regardless of the quality of my edits and articles, just because I am a descendant.

He also mentioned he intends to nominate both articles for deletion and has additionally deleted several verifably correct facts from the Wikipedia-page about me (Alexander Tuschinski), like birth date, birth place, alma mater etc. I wonder if his assessement, particularly about historical topics, is correct and without alternative. One small example - Constantin in the 1960s-80s published in both of the two most major, widely circulated and heavily curated German-language Romanian cultural magazines of the era "Volk und Kultur" and "Neue Literatur", and major Romanian press wrote about his plays. Axad12's blanket assessment that none of that is "notable" would mean that suddenly, many authors who published there and shaped the the German-language Romanian 1960s-80s cultural scene would be stripped of their notability, which would (seemingly at random) suddenly exclude a huge part of majorly published Romanian German-language culture from Wikipedia. I get the impression that Axad12's assessment and behaviour might be rather motivated by a bias against me, the author, than by the content of the articles.

I'm currently working on my PhD in history about my great-grandfather Demeter's biography. On Wikipedia, I write with great care to be neutral, and I uncover facts that I feel expand Wikipedia with important information on notable topics, and your positive feedback on the article about Constantin was very encouraging. Each article took months of research and writing, and I aim to write more articles related to this history that I study. If Axad12's position is correct, I could no longer write about my field of academic expertise, not because of any issues within the articles, but solely because of the family I was born into. I believe the COI notices on Constantin's and Demeter's pages were uncalled for, as there have never been objections to the contents of the articles, which I write as neutral and verifiable as possible. He also said I do breach Wikipedia's terms as I did original archival research, which I found quite a shocking statment. Due to original research, I was able to piece back together Constantin's bibliography, for example, which, for the first time, is published in its entirety here on Wikipedia.

I appreciate it very much if you look into the matter and tell me your opinion. I want to expand the page about Demeter with more research of his WW1 service, and I plan to create more pages related to Northern Bukovina history, like about the Cernauti Court of Appeal, and about several notable people. I feel if I cannot write about topics that are often almost 100 years ago, just because my ancestors happened to be involved, it is quite an uncalled for development. I feel an article's content should be judged, not the author, and particularly these articles about Romanian and Austrian-Hungarian history are about events that I was not even born yet when they happened, so everything I write is not based on my personal subjective experiences, but on those historical sources that I quote. Thank you for taking your time, and best wishes, Alexander ATuschinski (talk) 23:25, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would refer you once again to WP:COI and WP:OR, the contents of which are self-explanatory. Axad12 (talk) 20:55, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello, ATuschinski. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Axad12 (talk) 03:26, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Previous promotional activity on your behalf...

... seems to have been recorded here [1]. Axad12 (talk) 21:06, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Alexander Tuschinski

Hello ATuschinski -- Based on your submissions to the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demeter Ritter von Tuschinski, I believe that you have stated that you are Alexander Tuschinski? Assuming that is the case you absolutely must not edit the article on yourself again; the conflict of interest is obvious and your previous edits have led to a ridiculously bloated article. If you wish to make suggestions about the content then they must be made on the article's talk page, and must be supported by reliable, professionally published sources that are not written or edited by you. If you edit Alexander Tuschinski directly again, you risk being blocked from editing either that article in particular or in general. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 02:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Espresso Addict, could I just request confirmation that the notice above also relates to the user editing about himself within other articles, which he has also had a marked tendency to do? Such edits certainly fall outside of the COI policy and thus the COI edit request process (via article talkpages) would be the appropriate way for the user to proceed if he wishes to suggest such edits. Axad12 (talk) 09:00, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Break-Up Film Poster 2014.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Break-Up Film Poster 2014.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:12, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Timless Tuschinski Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Timless Tuschinski Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:41, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pagini Juridice for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pagini Juridice, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pagini Juridice until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]