This user has autoconfirmed rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.

User talk:TheQ Editor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


  User Page   Talk Page   Contributions   Guestbook   Barnstars   CVU/A   Articles  


GA Cup[edit]

So......you're a participant now. Right?--Dom497 (talk) 23:52, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

@Dom497: Yes, Christine emailed me and I told her I would not judge the 2015 Cup. I've taken a long break from Wikipedia and I would like to get used to it again. However, if you really need me to be a judge, I think I can do it. I just want to relax a bit this summer.  ΤheQ Editor  Talk? 00:48, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Do whatever you want! I just wanted to make sure someone didn't hack you or something. ;). Enjoy the summer!--Dom497 (talk) 01:38, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

GA Review: Tim McKee[edit]

Q Editor, thank you for jumping on the GA Review for the Tim McKee article and banging it out. I see that you are participating in the GA Cup contest. I have another five articles pending for GA Review, all American and Australian Olympic swimmers in similar condition to Tim McKee. If you're looking to complete several quick reviews for the Cup, they should be easy work for the reviewer. Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:15, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

@Dirtlawyer1: That's fine with me. I'll start reviewing after I come back from vacation. Thanks,  ΤheQ Editor  Talk? 18:15, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Good to know. I've had 5 GA nominations sitting since January/February. They're clean, well-sourced, and there is significant overlap of formatting and references. Reviewed one, you've reviewed all. Knowing you're interested in doing these Olympic swimmer reviews, I may have another couple ready by the time you return from vacation. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 22:53, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

2015 GA Cup[edit]

WikiProject Good Articles's 2015 GA Cup - June 2015
Symbol support vote.svg

Welcome to the GA Cup! In less than 72 hours, the competition will begin! Before you all start reviewing nominations and reassessments we want to make sure you understand the following:

  • This is a friendly competition so we don't want any cheating/breaking of the rules. However, if you do believe someone is going against the rules, notify the judges. All the rules are listed here.
  • If you are a new editor or new to reviewing Good article nominations, it is imperative that you read the 4 essays/guides listed under FAQ #4. If you do not understand something, ask a judge for clarification ASAP!
  • The competition is not entirely about who can review the most nominations. Per the "Scoring" page, there is different criteria in which you can earn more points. Theoretically, you could review 10 nominations and have 80 points but another user could have reviewed 5 nominations and have 100 points. Yes, we want you to review as many nominations as you can as this will greatly increase the number of points you earn, but you must also keep in mind that every single review will be looked over by a judge. If we find that you are "rubber-stamping" (in other words, the review is not complete but you still passed/failed the article) you may be disqualified without warning. The same applies with reassessments. If you just say that the article should be delisted or kept with no explanation, points will not be awarded.
  • Remember, to submit Good article reviews and reassessments on your submissions page (Some of you have not created your submissions page yet. Only reviews/reassessments submitted on your submissions page can earn points. If you participated in the 2014-2015 GA Cup, you still need to re-create your submissions page.). Detailed instructions on how to submit reviews and reassessments can be found under the "Submissions" page. Ask a judge if you need clarification.

Also, rather than creating a long list on what to remember, make sure you have read the "Scoring", "Submissions", and "FAQ" pages.

Now some of you are probably wondering how on earth the rounds will work.

The rounds will work in a similar fashion as the previous competition, with the exception of the first round. Round 1 will have everyone compete in one big pool. Depending on the final number of participants after sign-ups close, a to-be-determined number of participants will move on (highest scorers will move on) to Round 2. We guarantee that the top 15 will move on (this number may change), so make sure you aim for those top positions! Moving on to Round 2, participants will be split into pools. The pools will be determined by a computer program that places participants by random. More details regarding Round 2 will be sent out at the end of Round 1.

It is important to note that the GA Cup will run on UTC time, so make sure you know what time that is for where you live! On that note, the GA Cup will start on July 1 at 0:00:01 UTC; Round 1 will end on July 29 at 23:59:59 UTC; Round 2 will commence on August 1 at 0:00:01 UTC. All reviews must be started after or on the start time of the round. If you qualify for Round 2 but do not complete a review before the end of Round 1, the review can be carried over to Round 2; however that review will not count for Round 1. Prior to the start of the the second round, participants who qualify to move on will be notified.

Finally, if you know anyone else that might be interesting in participating, let them know! Sign-ups close on July 15 so there is still plenty of time to join in on the action!

If you have any further questions, contact one of the judges or leave a message here.

After sign-ups close, check the Pools page as we will post the exact number of participants that will move on to the next round. Because this number will be determined past the halfway mark of Round 1, we encourage you to aim to be in the top 15 as the top 15 at the end of the round are guaranteed to move on.

Cheers from 3family6, Dom497, Figureskatingfan, Jaguar and MrWooHoo.

To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 28 June 2015 (UTC)