User talk:Aaeliaba

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 10:54, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Sonic the Hedgehog (film), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. The order of cast members should follow the credits or poster billing block. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 06:12, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New message from TheGoodAndHolyLord

Hello, Aaeliaba. You have new messages at TheGoodAndHolyLord's talk page.
Message added 07:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

December 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Spider-Man, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. -- ferret (talk) 03:04, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry sir, I was putting "speed" because for the description because there's evidence that Spider-Man has superhuman speed like leaping and swinging even running and also for his powers and abilities, I put hand-to-hand combat because there's also shown the evidence where Spider-Man fought enemies in hand-to-hand, but yeah, I'm sorry sir, I should've explained my reason before I do something, I'm sorry Ferret, it will not happen again. -- Aaeliaba (talk) 08:17 7 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022

Can you please stop making edits like this? You're just adding a bunch of unnecessary words that essential say the same thing. It's not good to add additional words with no real benefit. And if you haven't noticed, various editors undo it every time you do it, so you're not accomplishing anything. So please stop. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 18:21, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Mister Mxyzptlk, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 21:09, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 19:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Spider-Man shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sundayclose (talk) 18:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was mentioned that he has proportionate strength, "speed", and agility of a spider in Spectacular Spider-Man comic where Spidey explains his origin to Black Cat when he takes her to his apartment, and the word I mention speed is in there. I mean look and read in the link https://readcomiconline.li/Comic/The-Spectacular-Spider-Man-1976/Issue-87?id=19204. Not just in Spectacular Spider-Man, during his battle against Green Goblin, in Amazing Spider-Man issue 40, Spider-Man defeated Goblin where he says in his quote before defeating him, "Perhaps my strength can't save me now, Gobby...but I've another ace in the hole...don't tell me you've never heard of my swingin' SPIDER SPEED?!!" and then Spidey used it against Goblin and land a final blow by kicking him in the face. These are the proof that Spider-Man does possess superhuman speed, I know that his may not be significant to Flash or Superman, but his speed is said to have travel 200-250m/mph. His powers aren't only agility, his speed is included too. Even in his origin story when Peter faced Crusher Hogan, it was said in his quote "Proportionate speed, agility, and strength of a gigantic spider" when Peter dodged Crusher Hogan's attack. If you want me to share this to talk page, I'd love too, but show me how. Aaeliaba (talk) 12:38, 20 June 2023 (UTC) Aaeliaba (talk) 18:48, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring is not determined by who is right or wrong. Read WP:EW and especially WP:3RR. If you revert again you can lose your editing privileges. Sundayclose (talk) 18:50, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay you said that if I wish to edit Spider-Man where do I start doing the talk page in order for me to explain what I told you before? Aaeliaba (talk) 18:52, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do I find talk page in Spider-Man so that I can share my opinions in talk page in Spider-Man section? Aaeliaba (talk) 18:54, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've used talk pages before, you know how to do this. MrOllie (talk) 18:55, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Like in Spider-Man or to you in your talk page? Sometimes I don't know which talk page Aaeliaba (talk) 18:56, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I think I knew how already. Aaeliaba (talk) 19:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Spider-Man. Sundayclose (talk) 22:52, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 21:14, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aaeliaba. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:42, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]