User talk:Abhiijiith

Kanakam Kamini Kalaham

November 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nivin Pauly has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nivin Pauly was changed by Abhiijiith (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.925056 on 2020-11-25T05:59:39+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:00, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abhiijiith, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Abhiijiith! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kanakam Kaamini Kalaham

Hello, Abhiijiith. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kanakam Kaamini Kalaham".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 10:37, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, I'm McSly. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. McSly (talk) 14:46, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the statement which states Ayurveda as a pseudoscience which is not true. Ayurveda is not a pseudoscience and is having therapeutic effects. Abhiijiith (talk) 14:53, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ayurveda. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Hipal (talk) 16:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021 (2)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in complementary and alternative medicine. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:35, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kanakam Kamini Kalaham moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kanakam Kamini Kalaham, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. nearlyevil 665 06:33, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Despite this item having previously been moved to draft on two occasions, with appropriate advice left, it has again been moved to mainspace without much indication that it can pass WP:NFF or WP:NFILM. This is 'move-warring' and is disruptive to the encyclopedia. Therefore it is likely that the item will be proposed at a deletion discussion. Eagleash (talk) 11:33, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kanakam Kaamini Kalaham

The article Kanakam Kaamini Kalaham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable future film, fails WP:NFF as production wasn't notable. Having a teaser trailer released does not establish notability. Should be moved back to draft until release, or outright deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 17:33, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kanakam Kaamini Kalaham for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kanakam Kaamini Kalaham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanakam Kaamini Kalaham until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Donaldd23 (talk) 03:24, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey a notable actors work will come under notable films too. So I think the page should not be removed. Abhiijiith (talk) 03:32, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Enkilum Chandrike

You do not quote any references, your article may be removed to moved to Draft space. Please read several simila articles to learn how to do it. Xx236 (talk) 07:56, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Enkilum Chandrike moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Enkilum Chandrike. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and Movie Came out today, possibly read WP:Cystral_Ball. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Happy Editing! -I Followed The Username Policy (talk) 11:58, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adithyan Chandrashekar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Adithyan Chandrashekar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Akevsharma (talk) 01:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Adithyan Chandrashekar

Hello, Abhiijiith. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Adithyan Chandrashekar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 10:34, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]