User talk:Afgtnk

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.--Matilda ^talk 21:38, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Todd Carney, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 11:40, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Sport in Australia. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 05:41, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Breach of WP:3RR at Sport in Australia

Both you and 144.132.28.156 are now guilty of edit warring and a formal breach of the three revert rule. This is highly liable to lead to you being blocked from editing. Please step back and let others sort out that content. HiLo48 (talk) 06:34, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TV Ratings

Please see my comments on the article's Talk page HiLo48 (talk) 06:52, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sport in Australia

Suggestion: instead of the subjective "major stadium", why not use "Stadiums with seating over 75,000" or something more subjective. Otherwise might want to reference "major stadium". Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:47, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Sport in Australia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Bidgee (talk) 09:54, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dek0001 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Bidgee (talk) 12:22, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sport in New South Wales

I said take it to Talk, and even opened a section there for you to present your thoughts. HiLo48 (talk) 07:16, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]