User talk:Agentbla

List of Internet Exchange Points by size‎

I noticed your comment about spending 7 hours making the table. I assume that was formatting it and not just entering the data. I have found a very quick method of making tables by working in a spreadsheet program and turning that into a web page, then cutting and pasting the resultant html into the Wikipedia page. It just takes a few minutes once you have the data in. I used an old version of Excel so it does not include all that crappy Microsoft coding. ww2censor 05:27, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I suppose gathering that info could take quite a while indeed. Cheers. ww2censor 11:45, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good job updating the data in List of Internet Exchange Points by size! Thanks! - Ilse @ 20:11, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hey, thanks for updating the iPhony citation with cite-web. I have a mental block when it comes to syntax on that template and usually have to go back later when I remember it and fill in all the useful fields. If you're feeling really adventurous, I'd appreciate the same help on The Soxaholix. I'll admit that now that I remember needing to put those templates in, I'm just lazy at this point. ;) Thanks! ju66l3r 22:37, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You da man! Thanks! ju66l3r 01:20, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infringement?‎

I'd like to know why you reported the article http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nikolai_Melnik like a copyright violation. I've checked the sources cited in the article, and everything is valid and no specific information seems or could be stolen regarding the article's content.

Is just a small bio about a guy who did a great job when s*it hit the fan back in '86. In 5 days it will be another Chornobyl anniversary, it's completely pointless to vandalise an article with unsustained copyright problems allegations.

Please, specify why you marked that article as "illegal" (copyright infrigment) next time you plan to set it that way.

Remember: Wikipedia doesn't allows or encourages stealing copyrighted information but they also don't like people who makes unsustained and unjustified copyright claims.

Thank you.

PS: I have returned the article to it's previous state meanwhile. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.127.29.220 (talk) 21 April 2007

Almost the entire Wikipedia entry is a copy of the St. Petersburg Times article that is quoted as a source. Each and every sentence in the "Life" section has been copied verbatim from the article which is clearly marked as "Copyright The St. Petersburg Times 1993 - 2007" at the bottom of the article page. Therefore the Wikipedia entry has to be either deleted or rewritten. Anyway: your understanding of copyright violation seems to be flawed. As the case is pretty clear I have reinstated the copyvio. I am certainly not politically or otherwise motivated to remove information. Agentbla 15:50, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation: Construcciones Aeronáuticas

Not so much unwelcome as simply unnecessary - see Wikipedia:Copyright violations on history pages. If you spot such a problem, you can just roll it back yourself rather than drag it through the copyvio process. You should, of course, note the copyvio in the edit summary and leave a message for the contributor. Practically speaking, it means that the issue is dealt with on the spot, and that we don't have otherwise fine content hidden under a copyvio notice for a week or more! :) --Rlandmann 22:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rebecca Falcon

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A {{prod}} template has been placed on Rebecca Falcon, by Tony Sidaway (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}.

Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Grim Reaper Bot 07:11, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Global city

Your edit does change the list heading numbers. Some have complained that changing the numbers is a deviation from the list, so the go ahead and alter the list afterwards. I don't agree, but it may be necessary to undo your minor change.

Just thought you should know. I think the change is fine. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 12:25, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:DFP graphic card cutted.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:DFP graphic card cutted.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 19:41, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Windows 7 editions

I see that you removed SHA-1 hashes info in this revision: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Windows_7_editions&oldid=385585704 Could you please explain your decision, especially considering an appropriate part of article discussion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Windows_7_editions#Append_CRC_and_MD5_of_each_disk_and_preinstall_to_the_article ? Penartur (talk) 17:34, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because there was no answer from you, i've took the liberty of restoring original content, according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Windows_7_editions#Append_CRC_and_MD5_of_each_disk_and_preinstall_to_the_article . Feel free to discuss that on the article talk page. Penartur (talk) 17:17, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Popova

Hi Agentbla, I'm Baldy Bill and looking at your edit history I think we have similar interests on Wikipedia with removal of garbage! I reviewed (and rejected because some of the sources were too woolly) Maria Popova for the Did You Know? process, and I'm reasonably satisfied that she does meet the notability criteria at WP:NRV as major sources such as New York Times, Reuters, Time and Forbes have written about her in some depth. Don't get me wrong, there are plenty of articles out there that need deleting for promoting nobodies, but the student who was the major contributor to this one does not appear to have any conflict of interest and she certainly seems to be quite well-known. I'm reverting your edit so I thought I should do you the courtesy of letting you know why. Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 19:50, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Agentbla. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Agentbla. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sharp PC-G850V moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sharp PC-G850V, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 13:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Werner Jacobi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Werner Jacobi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sharp PC-G850V

Hello, Agentbla. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sharp PC-G850V, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Werner Jacobi

Hello, Agentbla. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Werner Jacobi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Mobile Protected Firepower. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 18:29, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Werner Jacobi has been accepted

Werner Jacobi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 01:36, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature and linter errors

Just a reminder that your signature contains obsolete font tags. They create Linter errors, and it is advised that you change your signature to —<small style="color:#FF4500;">Agentbla</small> <sup>([[User_talk:Agentbla|talk]])</sup> ASAP.

The purpose of this message is because Linter errors affect the way the page looks, and with a lot of errors, the page may render badly. To reduce Linter errors, please change your signature.

If the software doesn't accept my replacement signature, let me know, and if that's the case, unfortunately you may have to change it to something else. Sheep (talk) 15:07, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]