User talk:Agile5468
January 2024[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2002 Überlingen mid-air collision. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. The note you removed clearly says to not use simulation images in the infobox per guidance at Template:Infobox aircraft occurrence: "Representations or computer generated images should not be used". This can not be more clear. Echoedmyron (talk) 12:23, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at 2002 Überlingen mid-air collision shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dual Freq (talk) 00:44, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at SilkAir Flight 185. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 01:28, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
What's your main purpose on Wikipedia's aviation pages?[edit]
Your hostility is not needed if someone corrects you, it is just Wikipedia editors trying to make a informational page accurately correct to the story. 70.167.194.163 (talk) 16:56, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
February 2024[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Japan Air Lines Flight 123. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please do not list causes in the infobox's summary parameter. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:30, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on SilkAir Flight 185. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 05:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. – The Grid (talk) 14:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC)