User talk:Agnostos Theos
Agnostos Theos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #27238 was submitted on Oct 21, 2019 10:56:03. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 10:56, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Agnostos Theos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I started contributing to Wikipedia on a public IP address in my local library. One day I forgotten to sign out and the next day I saw a large number of edits that I'm unaware of. That's when I realized that someone used my account without my permission and started to violate and make disruptions through my account. The next day I'm notified that my account is listed and facing topic ban procedure. I was devastated because it was not my fault. Everything that came after that topic ban maybe my fault because I neglected that warning and started contributing. Because of my amateur knowledge about these banning procedures and my strive to contributing, my account then blocked indefinitely. I'm now revoking all my actions caused by my inept knowledge about Wikipedia's guidelines, solely because I was an amateur in this platform and I was just started to learn all the rules and regulations about Wikipedia's editing procedures. Same goes with my careless creation of sockpuppetry to avoid topic ban. That the block is no longer necessary because I understand why I was blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead. My conduct (under any account or IP address) is not connected in any way with the block. I was blocked as a result because I used the same IP range.
Decline reason:
Since you state that you left your account unsecured on a public computer and it was used by others, this account is now considered compromised and is ineligible to be unblocked. 331dot (talk) 10:16, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Agnostos Theos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I started contributing to Wikipedia on a public IP address in my local library. One day I forgotten to sign out and the next day I saw a large number of edits that I'm unaware of. That's when I realized that someone used my account without my permission and started to violate and make disruptions through my account. The next day I'm notified that my account is listed and facing topic ban procedure. I was devastated because it was not my fault. Everything that came after that topic ban maybe my fault because I neglected that warning and started contributing. Because of my amateur knowledge about these banning procedures and my strive to contributing, my account then blocked indefinitely. I'm now revoking all my actions caused by my inept knowledge about Wikipedia's guidelines, solely because I was an amateur in this platform and I was just started to learn all the rules and regulations about Wikipedia's editing procedures. Same goes with my careless creation of sockpuppetry to avoid topic ban. That the block is no longer necessary because I understand why I was blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead. My conduct (under any account or IP address) is not connected in any way with the block. I was blocked as a result because I used the same IP range.
Decline reason:
I'm sorry, I cannot unblock you at this time. In the one statement, you say your account was compromised and someone else edited using the same IP. Then you say you violated your TBAN and committed sockpuppetry out of ignorance of the rules. Either way, you have not addressed the reasons for your block. Using multiple accounts to avoid sanctions such as a TBAN or a block is very serious. Please read Wikipedia:SOCKBLOCK carefully. Please read Wikipedia:Compromised accounts carefully.-- Deepfriedokra 03:55, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge
|
Hello Agnostos Theos. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing! If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: {{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}}
Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC) |
Raegan Revord
As you started the article, I wanted to let you know Raegan Revord's article was deleted and moved to User:Alden_Loveshade/Raegan_Revord. I hope to see it return to main space. Responsible edits are welcomed there. Alden Loveshade (talk) 05:02, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Wonderwell
A tag has been placed on Wonderwell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Deleted to make room for the acceptance of Draft:Wonderwell
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Qcne (talk) 15:22, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
The article Wayanad (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This disambiguation page contains the primary topic and one other topic for the ambiguous title and no other topics can be found within a reasonable time.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:03, 24 November 2023 (UTC)