User talk:Airview95

Hello, Airview95! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 01:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

--The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 01:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Further:To add a WP:RS citation just insert a (direct) reference right after your edit like this: <ref>(insert your link here)</ref> . Unsourced edits might (and usually are and will be) reversed without further comment. Regards, --The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 01:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again and still: "Popular vote winner in bold?"

Since you commented before or are otherwise involved, please take a look at Template talk:Infobox Election#Popular vote winner in bold?, [1].--The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 04:29, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism of United States presidential election, 1960 article

Harry Byrd was not a candidate for president in 1960 the votes you keep adding were from 1956 (READ HIS ARTICLE), he did however receive electoral votes. It is clear you feel he belongs in the info box but many others disagree, bring your views to the talk page to discuss it. As for your putting info in bold the current consensus is to only put the electoral vote winner in bold. A link to this discussion is already on your talk page.

If your blatant vandalism continues you will eventually be blocked.

==============Stop messing with others hard work!!!!!!============

May 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 04:55, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should discuss controversial edits at the articles talk page and/or at the page pointed out to you.--The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 04:55, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Temper tantrum Vandalism of United States presidential election, 1960 article

You have been asked repeatedly by several editors to make your case on the talk page for inclusion of Harry F. Bryd, (in the info box) first rather then just doing it. Obviously you do not have any good rationalization for your edits otherwise you would have discussed it by now. Since you can not make an argument for inclusion, you need to stop behaving like a child and cease your additions of vandalism, otherwise you will have to be banned from editing. Your temper tantrum over this article demonstrates that you are not mature enough to use Wikipedia, and all of your edits are suspect and should deleted on sight.

If you insist on continuing to use Wikipedia, you should check out the following articles which cover topics you must not have learned in kindergarten. Sharing, Consensus, Group Work, and Collaboration.

If this does not help I suggest starting you own wiki website, because your not wanted here! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.114.182.211 (talk) 18:28, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image changing

Please stop changing images discussion. The current standard is that official photos are preferred. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:08, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]