User talk:Akatie

Ruth Macloon

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Ruth Macloon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ... discospinster _talk 01:08, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Hector Belisle

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Hector Belisle, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Hector Belisle seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Hector Belisle, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 02:03, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bill Savitt has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 16:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

I removed your AutoWikiBrowser because you don't have enough edits and your application has been denied... sorry! But try to edit more :) --Party!^{Talk to me!} 22:03, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:RobertPhilsonStore.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:RobertPhilsonStore.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:25, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

Hello! I was wondering if you could translate the part in Latin of the article History of Grandi's series#Grandi. It seems like you are the person for the job, mathematician who speaks Latin :). So, if you have time, take a look. Goldencako 01:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Albertson-Lillian.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Albertson-Lillian.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:18, 14 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. O sama K 13:18, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zebidah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zebidah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 02:02, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zebudah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zebudah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 02:02, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Birgitta Jónsdóttir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jón Ólafsson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:39, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Francis R. Whelton

Hello, Akatie,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Francis R. Whelton should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis R. Whelton .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, -MJH (talk) 23:01, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Working on it now Akatie (talk) 11:01, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I believe everything you are saying about your family member. Now, for it to be an article in an encyclopedia, you need to find independent 3rd party references, like newspaper articles, that cite each fact that you want to include in the article. See WP:REFB and WP:BIO for instructions. The Boston Post & Herald sound like the place to start. Good luck!---MJH (talk) 11:56, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Transcribed the Obit, will scan for citation. I'd forgotton about the Medal of Honor. His son Frank Jr. won one during WWII. Akatie (talk) 12:05, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your scan will not be usable, is it online? Or a link to the article microfiche in a library.---MJH (talk) 12:34, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I found some references here [1] - putting the info in the article comes after you can find the references. Looks like you will have enough material and refs.---MJH (talk) 12:31, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, a bit more cleanup and I'll have it. If only my grandmother Ruth Macloon was allowed a none -anonymous byline for her contemporary work ... citations for her are my next challengeAkatie (talk) 12:56, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Google books

Template:Google books has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Nevé –selbert 17:24, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Calinix

I have moved the Calinix article to draft space, it needs a lot more work than the way you left it to be suitable for wikipedia. Govvy (talk) 15:12, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It's been a while since I created a page. Akatie (talk) 12:30, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Calinix

Hello, Akatie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Calinix, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]