User talk:Alex1369

Welcome!

Hello, Alex1369! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Discord server • IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 20:36, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tirzepatide, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The encyclopedia represents established scientific facts, not preliminary research as you cited. Please familiarize yourself with WP:MEDRS and use reputable reviews for medical content. Zefr (talk) 21:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

We are not going to just sell medicine on Wikipedia. 46.143.118.89 (talk) 22:34, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

The article that was added is completely scientific and accurate. It will certainly add to the reader's information. The article was only about exercise along with terceptide. In the added article, the instructions for use or the method of making the medicine are not emphasized, which requires an encyclopedia.

We are not going to just sell medicine on Wikipedia. 46.143.118.89 (talk) 22:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

When you refer to "we", what do you mean? A Wikipedia account is intended for one user only. If you are a spokeperson for a group, this will not be allowed. Wikipedia does not exist for advertising the publications of a research group.

For medical content, we use WP:MEDRS reviews - see WP:MEDASSESS, left pyramid. Your study is early-stage primary research, and is too preliminary for use in the encyclopedia. When a review is published, we can reconsider. Zefr (talk) 23:23, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Thousands of true and false facts can be found in Wikipedia. Thousands of unreferenced sentences can be found in Wikipedia. On this page, many contents are without reference. I have uploaded an abstract of a scientific article that has passed many filters and has a code of ethics and a clinical trial code. Then you delete this article and teach me how to use Wikipedia! 204.18.45.37 (talk) 05:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Tirzepatide shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You should have the idea now that your edit is unacceptable as primary research. Also, you have copied an abstract from a publication, which is a copyright violation, WP:COPYVIO. Zefr (talk) 15:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Apparently, teams have monopolized the authority of Wikipedia and are against science. Their interest is seeking monopoly, selling medicine and depriving readers from reading science. In line with taking a step in the path of science, I will soon reflect the results of this research in many reputable media. 46.143.107.240 (talk) 15:36, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tirzepatide, you may be blocked from editing. gobonobo ^{+ c} 05:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Alex1369. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Tirzepatide, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Zefr (talk) 15:23, 4 June 2024 (UTC)