User talk:Alfons2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Alfons2! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 18:31, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

January 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Szczekociny has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://danielscounter.blogspot.com/2008/01/szczekociny-family-mission-to-revive.html (matching the regex rule \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:31, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tach[edit]

What s going on? ff JaHn 23:37, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, nice to meet you overseas. I decided to make a little (spiritual) emigration. I think I needed that desperately. But I'm fine, and I hope so are you. --Alfons2 (talk) 05:10, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, Master. I mean all the time between my last post. If You understand, what I want to say. However, the distance between it and today is not really ... relevant. Isn t it? ff JaHn 01:24, 1 May 2010 (UTC) PS CITATION (Doppelpunkt): "Des Schalkes Knecht, dem geht s nicht schlecht, er weiß, dem Schalk ist alles recht." And, Master Alfons2, that s the way how my brain, my mind, is floating. Because I do "believe" in ... GOD. ff JaHn 01:31, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine, but - hopefully I'm not being rude - I don't think it's relevant. I've had the chance to have a few talks with Buddhists. They don't believe in God, they believe in reincarnation. It doesn't matter. God, as far as I understand, doesn't care abour your beliefs. He does care about what you're doing. And yes, you're right. Distances are terribly irrelevant, both for time and for place. If you don't answer today, you'll answer tomorrow. If I can't express myself in the German Wikipedia, I can do so in the English Wikipedia. See you soon --Alfons2 (talk) 14:40, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How ever, Master ... my GOD is not the kind You have to wind up on sunday. HAND (Have A Nice Day)! ff JaHn 11:39, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Soundtrack, tonight: "... that s all, we are stardust, we are golden, and we ve got to get ourselves back to the garden ..." ff JaHn 21:41, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Listening to music is enjoying nostalgia. --Alfons2 (talk) 08:10, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Master Alfons2, that s right. And music is A language of feelings. And ... is there something wrong with remembering feelings through SOUNDS? ff JaHn 22:28, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know how you feel, but for me it's nicer to chat in English than in Teutonian. --Alfons2 (talk) 07:37, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I see. My problem with that is my minimal English. Master BZ (You know) said once about that, that I ve maybe never had a pet. And he s right with that. ff JaHn 23:50, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Your masters seem to be your pets, if I understand correctly. Never mind. And your English is not minimal at all. --Alfons2 (talk) 17:22, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Master Alfons2! Don t think somewhat like that about me. I do really accept all the Masters. Remember Master Ben Soma ... to learn from anyone is A way to success. ff JaHn 00:24, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK. In a way, on the other hand (I learned that phrase from the master BZ), You re right. About masters. And me. And pets. Because, as far as I can see, no one ever could be the master for one another. You are always and ever the one and only specialist of Yourself. YOU ARE YOUR EXPERIENCE. ff JaHn 21:34, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As I said, your English is not minimal at all. To wind up with God on Sunday seems to me a highly poetic expression, I wouldn't even know how to translate it. "Am Sonntag vor Gott antreten"? That sounds a bit too militaristic, doesn't it. --Alfons2 (talk) 07:30, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can see it hasn t anything to do with to "wind up with" but with "not to wind up on sundays". ff JaHn 00:14, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway. Remember we talked once, on the other side of the English Channel, about a secret word that caused a lot of problems for me? I didn't want to tell that particular word at that time, but if you're still interested to know, I could tell it now. --Alfons2 (talk) 13:40, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On the other side of the English Channel ... ? OK. Something about that happens. In my brain. Or mind. But I can not really get it. Would You please be so kind to help me to recognize it? ff JaHn 01:29, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
See here. --Alfons2 (talk) 10:55, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I m not sure (I m never sure), what You exactly do mean. But if it has something to do with a frightfull assumption, I only could say, or write, that I do, time after time, ask myself, which one of the infinite possibilities the accurate possibility is. If You do understand, what I tried to ... publicise. ff JaHn 21:55, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
On the one hand, the assumption is indeed frightful. On the other hand, it's quite a simple thing. We're talking about a four-letter word - a word with 4 letters. --Alfons2 (talk) 06:50, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please, Master, have in mind, that I m a small person. I do not really understand very much. And, by the way, I m even not sure, if I do understand anything. So I would like it, if You could give me a little bit more ... input. ff JaHn 19:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure if I should. My input can be dangerous. --Alfons2 (talk) 19:57, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I see ... but, Master Alfons2, I m sure, somehow, it couldn t be dangerous to me. ff JaHn
It could give you sleepless nights. --Alfons2 (talk) 20:06, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don t think so. At least NO MORE sleepness nights. ff JaHn 20:09, 17 May 2010 (UTC) PS As the BZ once cited: "Der Ein Alptraum aus dem man erwacht erwachen kann, ist nicht der wirkliche Alptraum ..." ff JaHn 20:13, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, let's put the question the other way round. What do you think is the reason that it's more and more difficult for me (and for others) to contribute to the German Wikipedia? --Alfons2 (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, Master. But I m, after all the years, a nosy guy. However. I do recently think, that it has something to do with somewhat like ... degeneration. ff JaHn 20:41, 17 May 2010 (UTC) PS Otherwise there must be people from outer space play their game(s). ff JaHn 20:49, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I see people playing their games, but they are not from outer space. And regarding degeneration... it reminds me of Brecht: "Der Schoss ist fruchtbar noch, aus dem das kroch." --Alfons2 (talk) 05:37, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. As my Father once said to me: "Be careful. The old spirit is still blowing." ff JaHn 20:42, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's all I wanted to hear. --Alfons2 (talk) 05:40, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I like to tell You a secret thing: I m, right now, alone in a bureau ... and listening to that >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bz1mEMiNPHQ ... and I m dancing to it, all alone. And I m crying ... FLOW MY TEARS. But ... I m not a policeman. ff JaHn 18:15, 19 May 2010 (UTC) By the way: I don t wanna get on Your nerves, but I need to ... publicise this. Because it s the first time that I m dancing, again, after over 20 years. ff JaHn 19:19, 19 May 2010 (UTC) PS You know? THEY can NEVER stop IT. ff JaHn 19:22, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Going back to Wikipedia. I've set up for myself a pair of "basic rules" that are sort of paradoxical.

  1. Knowledge is infinite, endless. An encyclopaedia is therefore never finished.
  2. An encyclopaedia needs an open mind. If we read Ben Soma the other way round, people unwilling to learn should not even be allowed to touch the "edit this page" button.

Have a good day --Alfons2 (talk) 06:39, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The same to You. And more than one good day. As my father once said: "Morgen fangen tausend neue Tage an." OK, Master, back to WIKIPEDIA. This conglomerate of several minds seems to me not to be somewhat like a real holy alliance. I don t know on which ... branch were the wrong ... arbitration. But I m sure that there was, once, a wrong arbitration. If You can understand, what I tried to ... publicise. ff JaHn 21:33, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Life is like a labyrinth. In any given moment there are a lot of branchs. And in any given moment we could take the wrong arbitration. ff JaHn 21:42, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You mean that at a certain point, it went the wrong way, don't you. And how do we know it's a wrong way? When we realize it's a dead end... Your father must have been a special man. --Alfons2 (talk) 07:03, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
May be ... at least the relation between my father and me was, and is, special. I do love him, anyway. And, as I do see it, that s a lot. OK, Master Alfons2, let s go back to WIKIPEDIA. And back to certain points, where anyone could went the wrong way. And, yes, we realize it, when there s a dead end. But maybe that s too late. That s MY fear (POV and so on). ff JaHn 00:30, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
When you realize you're stuck in a dead end, the only thing you can do is to turn around, go back and look for something new. A new wave to ride, a new way to go... for example the English Wikipedia... --Alfons2 (talk) 16:31, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You know that I m focussed on the German-Language-WIKIPEDIA-Edition (GLWE)? ff JaHn 23:35, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You and I are 2 different persons, but let me tell you a story.
Once upon a time, there were some learned Jews living in Germany. They decided to write an encyclopedia about Jewish subjects, so they called it Encyclopaedia Judaica. In those days, there was no wiki, no internet and no computer, so they proceeded in alphabetical order. They started with A, B, C and came as far as L, with Lyra as the last entry, if I'm not mistaken. Unfortunately, this was in the year 1934, and for reasons you probably know, they were not able to proceed further on. But some of them emigrated to English-speaking countries, and so the Encyclopedia Judaica was finally finished and published in English.
It may not sound very modest, but sometimes I think I should take these people as an example. --Alfons2 (talk) 18:29, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That s new to me. And interesting. I m busy ... I ll be back soon. ff JaHn 20:14, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alfons2&oldid=692235909"