User talk:Ali Ehsani3
Ali Ehsani3, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Ali Ehsani3! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 3 October 2020 (UTC) |
May 2021
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did at Mohammad Ali Taheri, you may be blocked from editing. Störm (talk) 13:58, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:57, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Ali Ehsani3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
None of my edits have been disruptive or defamatory as they are all referenced from reliable sources such as the New York Times, Immigration and refugee board of Canada (Canadian government website), Radio Farda (branch of the U.S. government-funded Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty), etc. As you can see from my sources, all the terms and titles I have added about Mr. Taheri are commonly used to describe him in reliable sources. Since I have started to post, the admins of this page have been repeatedly removing the reliable sources without any explanation or justification. For example, today when I added a source by Radio Farda it was removed under the pretext that Radio Farda is an Iranian website and is not reliable. I responded that this is not true because Radio Farda is a branch of the U.S. government-funded Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Yet again my post was removed and I was reported for defamatory edits, whereas, I can see that the same news agency (Radio Free Europe) has been used on this Wikipedia page as a reference but that was deemed acceptable by admins because it was to their benefit. As I understand all Wikipedia articles should have a neutral point of view which means the article should not be used to only praise or promote a person. Unfortunately, the current Wikipedia page is completely biased, and the current block seems to be punitive. The material about living persons that is currently used is poorly sourced but when I use high-quality sources, my edits are removed and I am blocked so that Taheri’s followers can hide the facts about him that are available in reliable sources but they wish to be hidden on Wikipedia. I kindly ask Wikipedia to check my account and allow me to contribute to this page after I am unblocked. ThanksAli Ehsani3 (talk) 20:07, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You're missing the point ... it isn't about what your edits added (in which you may have been in the right) but about how you added them. Instead of initiating a talk page discussion with Störm, you went back and forth reverting and making your points in edit summaries. The cycle is bold, revert, discuss ... the last of which you did not do. — Daniel Case (talk) 21:22, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.