User talk:AllStarSun1

The owner of this account is suspected of abusively using multiple accounts.

(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets · sockpuppet investigations casepage)

afro-american as in africans in the americas.. not the us.. if u read the page youll know

Afro-Puerto Rican

Notice - by creating a page "Afro-Puerto Rican" and pasting the intellectual work and creation of another (myself) "African immigration to Puerto Rico" and taking the credit, you are not only violating Wikipedia policy, but you are also committing plagiarism which is against the law. The "African immigration to Puerto Rico" is part of a Puerto Rican immigration series and covers the history of the Africans in our island way before the island became known as Puerto Rico and our people Puerto Ricans. Therefore, please refrain from doing this in the future especially to an article such as this which has a "GA" status or you may be blocked from editing. Tony the Marine (talk) 04:29, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Hello AllStarSun1 and welcome to Wikipedia. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Jasper Deng (talk) 04:41, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last and only warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Spanish immigration to Puerto Rico. Hazard-SJ ± 04:42, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AllStarSun1 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Jasper Deng (talk) 05:12, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- Notice - User:TattelTales1 and User:AllStarSun1 are Sockpuppets and disrupting Wikipedia. The Sockpuppet accounts are pasting African immigration to Puerto Rico to Afro Puerto Rican and taking credit of the article. Tony the Marine (talk) 05:47, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The investigation has been filed. No need for any more action for now besides reverting the socks.Jasper Deng (talk) 05:47, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:36, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AFROdr for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Jasper Deng (talk) 06:41, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AllStarSun1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Admit to disobeying the rules, but I wont do it again and would contribute greatly to various article

Decline reason:

Since you are blocked for the abusive use of sockpuppets, you would need to address this in order for an unblock to be considered. While I will not guarantee an unblock under any circumstances, a good start would be to note here all accounts that were created or used by you, whether they are currently known to be your sockpuppets or not (and, obviously, don't create any more). Again, I am NOT guaranteeing you will be unblocked if you do so, but it's a start and a show of good faith. You'll also need to be a lot more specific about what exactly you understand that you did wrong, and particular ways you intend to correct that in the future. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:56, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AllStarSun1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand I did abuse the use of multiple accounts, specifically with DDatGuy1, TattelTales1, and DatPersonUDontKno, as well as from the IP Address 68.194.239.60, and I honestly wont do it again, and I will greatly contribute to various articles.

Decline reason:

As this is a block-evading account of User:DDatGuy1, it is necessary that you request unblocking from that account -- especially since you were blocked for a particularly vile comment. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 19:48, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AllStarSun1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand I did negatively use and abuse the use of editing privileges and multiple accounts, specifically with DDatGuy1, TattelTales1, and DatPersonUDontKno, as well as from the IP Address 68.194.239.60, and I honestly and sincerely wont do it again, and I will greatly contribute to various articles, by providing more valuable information about a specific subject and expanding the article, and I would do this request from original account, but its talk-page access has been revoked.

Decline reason:

And now talk page access here is getting revoked. You may contact the Ban Appeals Subcommittee if you still want to appeal the block. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 02:07, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.