User talk:Amateria1121

Your submission at AfC Amateria1121/Comparison of MUTCD-Influenced Traffic Signs was accepted

Amateria1121/Comparison of MUTCD-Influenced Traffic Signs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e decker ^talk 05:40, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw your Totem Park UBC photo

This is a great addition to the article, since there are hardly any chances to see what UBC looks like on a snowy day. Thanks a lot! Connor Behan (talk) 00:47, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

StVO-inspired sign comparison

Aren't you helping me with the StVO-inspired sign comparison? Can you help me please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barneyuj (talk • contribs) 22:54, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They aren't based on the StVO. They're based on the Vienna Convention, and we already have a page for that: Comparison of European road signs. That covers Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, and Chile and Colombia are on my MUTCD page.

My advice is this: maybe do a comparison of Asian signs instead? That way you can include places like Indonesia, Japan, and Thailand which are more MUTCD based, as well as China which does its own thing, plus Korea, Brunei, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, etc which are more based on the Vienna Convention.--Amateria1121 (talk) 23:03, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'll do a Micro-language comparison called German-Spanish StVO. Okay? So can you help me please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barneyuj (talk • contribs) 23:37, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why those two specifically? It's pretty narrow, so much so that I'm not even sure it's really in Wiki's scope, if you get me.--Amateria1121 (talk) 23:54, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cause this page is special. There's also a Malay version too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barneyuj (talk • contribs) 00:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give me a link to that page? Again, I still do not understand why it's 'special', as you say. The StVO was designed in Germany, and there is no Spanish version, not by that name at least. As far as I am aware, road signs in Spain were designed to conform with the Vienna Convention, not the StVO. As for Latin American signs, they are based on a mix between the American MUTCD and the Vienna Convention.

According to this image, Malaysia uses yellow diamond warning signs - they're on Google Street View too. If you can find a source and upload them individually to [1], I would be happy to add them to my MUTCD page.--Amateria1121 (talk) 00:18, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go. the link — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barneyuj (talk • contribs) 00:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Technical Barnstar
	Thanks for coming back to this page. We know your patient. Barneyuj (talk) 00:02, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Working on the English comparison of road signs

Are you still working on the English comparison of road signs?

If you are, it will be complete.

If not, I'll help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.233.62.147 (talk) 12:27, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's just something for me to play around with, that's why it's in my sandbox. I have no intent of making it a regular article. So I don't really need help with it.--Amateria1121 (talk) 19:50, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Still working on the English comparison of road signs

Are you working on the English comparison of road signs now? --Bareyman61 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 01:23, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Comparison of MUTCD-Influenced Traffic Signs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clearview. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Asia-America Traffic Control Manual Devices sign comparison

Hey Amateria1121? Would please create an article called the Asia-America Traffic Control Manual Devices sign comparison? I putted it in your sandbox. Jecoman (talk) 13:10, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No. Also, don't edit my sandbox.Amateria1121 (talk) 15:11, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well there's an article called the Asia-America Traffic Control Manual Devices sign comparison in my sandbox. Jecoman (talk) 17:39, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have indefinitely semi-protected your sandbox, to stop this disruptive editor from editing it. Let me know if you want it unprotected for any reason. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciated, thanks. --Amateria1121 (talk) 15:43, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indigenous peoples of the Pacific Northwest Coast, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sunshine Coast and Tillamook. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please

Could you help me by taking a look at the article about Clara Henry. I dont understand why the External links section doesnt show when I save the edits. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 19:50, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which links are you referring to? Amateria1121 (talk) 00:13, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Amateria1121. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

World speed limit map

Hi. Can you please update the World Speed Limit map to include 150km/h? Seems like Italy now has roads that fast. Thanks! Oh, also, Sudan should probably be split to include South Sudan.Terrorist96 (talk) 06:37, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the map was designed to show the maximum posted limit, hence why I had Washington at 70 and Nevada at 75, since I don't think either has actually posted 75/80. And I can't find any concrete evidence that any autostrade in Italy actually have a 150 limit, just that it's possible under certain conditions. But if you can find proof i'll go ahead and add it. --Amateria1121 (talk) 18:49, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Someone posted this as the source: Link Terrorist96 (talk) 19:30, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And I found this: Link.Terrorist96 (talk) 21:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Right, but it still doesn't sound like there are any segments that actually have a posted 150 kph limit, just that it's possible. I also can't find any images of actual signs showing a 150 limit either, which leads me to believe that it hasn't been implemented anywhere. --Amateria1121 (talk) 23:49, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sign comparison tables

Hi. I was wondering if you might like to work on comparison tables for Asia and the Americas. I believe we have enough countries available now. Fry1989 ^eh? 21:27, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well my idea with the MUTCD one was to have a comparison for the other hugely influential style guide (alongside the Vienna Convention in Europe). That's why I haven't really been on board with other comparison tables like the English-speaking one, as much as I might personally like to see them. Though if you have some suggestions please do share. Amateria1121 (talk) 02:28, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To me it would be a good idea to do comparison tables by continent. I am just unsure how to go about it. For Asia, I mean we have Japan, Korea, China, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, I'm working on Thailand right now and I have some documents for Vietnam... Creating the table itself is rather easy, but I don't really know what to include beyond that. Both the European and MUTCD articles have lots of extra information about things like fonts, languages, colour differences.

Maybe after I am done working on the Thai road signs, I can think about it more. Fry1989 ^eh? 18:00, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Amateria1121. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Amateria1121. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Amateria1121. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Message

I've left a message here. You can discuss. 2600:1700:6180:6290:9DF4:436E:5E7F:66B (talk) 17:10, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Comparison of MUTCD-influenced traffic signs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparison of MUTCD-influenced traffic signs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of MUTCD-influenced traffic signs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rs chen 7754 17:35, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]