User talk:Ambro23

License tagging for Image:Austin.brown.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Austin.brown.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:AUSTIN BROWN GUITAR.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AUSTIN BROWN GUITAR.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Auggie_clapper.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Auggie_clapper.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:54, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Auggie_midas.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Auggie_midas.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:08, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Jackson picture

Please refrain from adding that picture. The current one we have is fine. If you wish to change that, please conduct a discussion in the talk page, but do not arbitrarily add this image anymore.UberCryxic 19:54, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please STOP from adding that image. It will be continuously deleted. The one we have in the lead now is much better; that's why we want to keep it. Thank you.UberCryxic 02:59, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Jackson again

Hey, please see the talk page regarding your changes in the lead of the MJ article. I explained that putting in "African-American" does not represent a global viewpoint; it is more important that MJ is an American citizen rather than he is an African-American....again, to the global community (in America, yes it's more important that he's African-American, but once you adopt that standard you've broken Wikipedia global perspective requirements).UberCryxic 17:29, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:18_thumb.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:18_thumb.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 03:52, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Austin.brown.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Austin.brown.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 22:47, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:AUSTIN_GUITAR.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:AUSTIN_GUITAR.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 22:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Austin_clapper.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Austin_clapper.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 22:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Auggie_Interscope.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Auggie_Interscope.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 22:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Austinbrown.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Austinbrown.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 22:51, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Michaeljacksonblack.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Michaeljacksonblack.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 22:51, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Notification

AfD nomination of Austin Brown

An article that you have been involved in editing, Austin Brown, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austin Brown. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? InDeBiz1 (talk) 22:11, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Austin Brown

A tag has been placed on Austin Brown, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Austin Brown is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Austin Brown saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. InDeBiz1 (talk) 02:26, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Austin Brown, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Austin Brown is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Austin Brown saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. InDeBiz1 Review me! / Talk to me! 18:45, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Auggie studio thumb.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Auggie studio thumb.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:53, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Austin Brown headshot.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Austin Brown headshot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nik thestunned 12:19, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:AUST.GUITAR.jpg

The file File:AUST.GUITAR.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned file, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:10, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Austin Interscope.jpg

The file File:Austin Interscope.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned file, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:10, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced addition and edit warring at Candace Owens

Don't add unsourced content. We also don't have such a wikilink. -- BullRangifer (talk) 16:46, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Candace Owens shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- BullRangifer (talk) 16:46, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

You have been blocked temporarily from editing certain pages (Candace Owens) for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 22:53, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]