User talk:Amoolya1

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Ahluwalia. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Karl 334 ^{☞TALK to ME ☜} 16:27, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ahluwalia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ahluwalia was changed by Amoolya1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873819 on 2011-11-22T16:29:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:29, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Ahluwalia with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:39, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Ahluwalia

In the interest of keeping things more transparent, I am responding here rather than on email. Edits to Wikipedia need to follow Wikipedia's NPOV guidelines. Articles aim to be encyclopedic in tone, not promotional or biased. Furthermore, edits need to be fully referenced using sufficient citations. Continuing to add inappropriate material such as this is disruptive (and bordering on edit warring). Consider this your final warning; any further edits like this will result in a block on your editing. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:17, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ahluwalia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SH 15:41, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at Ahluwalia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:52, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]