User talk:An0nym0us7r011

August 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to List of dragons in popular culture has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of dragons in popular culture was changed by An0nym0us7r011 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866852 on 2013-08-06T02:10:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:10, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Principle of explosion with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:10, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to List of dragons in popular culture with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:10, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:02, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

An0nym0us7r011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have only been doing minor tests with editing, and maybe a few jokes, but after I had received my fair warnings I was still blocked for no new offenses. And that last edit I was going to change back, I was just joking around with Mark...An0nym0us7r011 (talk) 03:11, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were issued a final warning at 02:15 and then vandalized at 02:48. Unblock request declined. Tiptoety ^talk 03:16, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

An0nym0us7r011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As I said above I was going to change it back if he didn't but I didn't think I'd be blocked before I could. An0nym0us7r011 (talk) 03:29, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your username makes it clear what you're here for. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 04:40, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

An0nym0us7r011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wait, so now it's my name that I'm being blocked for? If that was the case then why wasn't it previously mentioned? And just so you know this isn't my personal IP address, so if you do in fact block this profile or IP, I might actually do what you fear the most... If you just unblock this profile, I promise you I won't give anymore trouble. An0nym0us7r011 (talk) 15:47, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What I fear the most is a zombie apocalypse. I don't think you are capable of bringing that about, but if you are going to resort to threats it is clearly time to just cut of your access to appeal in this manner. You may contact WP:BASC if you want to request unblock in the future. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:11, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.