User talk:Anhthu12345

October 2020

Hi everyone! Today I'm got a lot of busy today, this is a big serious important! The DVD is past standard-definition now, so they discontinued it right here, on December in the future term. Suddenly, I beg you don't make the stupidness thing around here, please do was I say okay, Thank you! PS: They hate that DVD! —User:Anhthu12345 (talk) 04:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 18:29, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anhthu12345! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. —J. M. (talk) 04:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at DVD. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 04:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at DVD. MrOllie (talk) 15:41, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:2020+Confetti+Crayons+439edit3 1.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:2020+Confetti+Crayons+439edit3 1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 08:30, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]