User talk:Anonymous130112

March 2022

Hello, I'm Askelaadden. Your recent edit(s) to the page Almoravid dynasty appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Askelaadden (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Almoravid dynasty, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 15:10, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Saadi Sultanate. M.Bitton (talk) 13:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unjustified sourced content removal

Why do you keep replacing the sourced map with one that obviously isn't sourced? M.Bitton (talk) 14:35, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 21:58, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Saadi Sultanate. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. R Prazeres (talk) 20:39, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Saadi Sultanate map is false, so I have the right to disagree with it. Regarding you, you pretend me an edit warring because you want me to be quiet. If you want me to be quiet block me. Anonymous130112 (talk) 14:33, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Battle of Tadla, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 11:40, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's not poorly sourced in the article Capture of Fez (1554) is mentioned that Fez was under Ottoman control, so you began an edit war an also for the article Battle of Wadi al-Laban and Capture of Fez (1576) for minor change and sourced edits which is not changed your content. You threatened to block me it is abuse power. Anonymous130112 (talk) 14:59, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Anonymous130112 reported by User:R Prazeres (Result: ). Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 16:09, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Saadi Sultanate

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 4 days for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. The steps of WP:Dispute resolution are open to you. EdJohnston (talk) 16:55, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 17:42, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anonymous130112 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I propose some change, I didn't edit warring Anonymous130112 (talk) 04:28, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you don't think you edit warred when you clearly did, there are no grounds to remove the block. This is a collaborative project where you cannot merely impose your will because you think it is correct, you must discuss disputed changes with other editors that disagree and arrive at a consensus. If you aren't willing to collaborate, this isn't the project for you. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:49, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.