User talk:Anonymoususer65783

October 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Asgardia (nation) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Asgardia (nation) was changed by Anonymoususer65783 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875935 on 2017-10-23T02:16:31+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:16, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 16:30, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Hello, I'm Adam9007. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Atari Jaguar— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Adam9007 (talk) 23:14, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Atari VCS (2019 console) ‎, you may be blocked from editing. -- ferret (talk) 12:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 14:45, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anonymoususer65783 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i was telling the truth Anonymoususer65783 (talk) 15:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Even if this was accurate, which it doesn't appear to be, it's not relevant. Please see WP:GAB to understand how to craft an acceptable unblock request. Yamla (talk) 15:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.