User talk:AramilFeraxa

April 2021

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Ya Ya (film): you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. User3749 (talk) 12:58, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, AramilFeraxa, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

AramilFeraxa, good luck, and have fun. User3749 (talk) 12:58, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Anarchyte (talk) 08:51, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Content

Hi There,

I see that you left a comment on my talk page re: removed content. If you take a look at the talk page for that particle article, you'll see that I've left an explanation for my removal. Please let me know if this helps!

Rollback granted

Hi AramilFeraxa. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! - TheresNoTime ^😺 12:45, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback on Esraj page

Hello, I noticed that you rolled back my changes on the esraj page, and I was hoping for an explanation. I replaced an inaccurate picture (as per the caption of the picture) with a more accurate one, and added a link to a relevant wikipedia page. I'm a newer editor of Wikipedia so I'd appreciate feedbacko n what was wrong with my changes. Autumn astronomer (talk) 06:19, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mistaken edit on your part

Tell me what is wrong with my edit on Fethiye. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fethiye&oldid=1057004900) Sainihånser (talk) 21:13, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You removed my edit

Hi, My edit on the Greater Pittsburgh section was not a mistake. I removed part of the section for the following reasons:

Removed this section due to undue weight placed on one single editorial published by the cited author. The presented argument was verified by the same editorial, by the same author, published in four different places. But the key point is the cited reference was an editorial.

According to Wikipedia guidelines: Giving due weight and avoiding giving undue weight means articles should not give minority views or aspects as much of or as detailed a description as more widely held views or widely supported aspects. Generally, the views of tiny minorities should not be included at all, except perhaps in a "see also" to an article about those specific views.

Wikipedia should not present a dispute as if a view held by a small minority is as significant as the majority view. Views held by a tiny minority should not be represented except in articles devoted to those views (such as the flat Earth). Giving undue weight to the view of a significant minority or including that of a tiny minority might be misleading as to the shape of the dispute. Wikipedia aims to present competing views in proportion to their representation in reliable sources on the subject.

Both the term 'Cleveburgh' and the idea of Cleveland and Pittsburgh are a single region is not a widely held, nor widely substantiated anywhere besides the author's own blog and the author's editorial being published in my multiple newspapers owned by the same parent company.

The final sentences were removed as the referenced page does not exist. The source links to a biography on the named author. Even if one tries to search for the name of the article it is not available to the general public and is this unverifiable.

The portion that I left still references the same editorial but places much less emphasis on the opinions of one man. Innatenobility (talk) 21:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you moving a blocked account to a Vanished user account?

What criteria did you use? @TheresNoTime: You seem to be the only Admin I see on this page, surely this isn't right correct per our policy on en:wiki I see this [1] - where did they request this rename? I may misunderstand our policy, but this just seems wrong that their edits on en:wiki aren't attributed to the original account name. Doug Weller talk 15:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller on Meta:Special:GlobalRenameRequest. AramilFeraxa (talk) 15:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, by some miracle I overlooked that this user is blocked. Give me a moment, I'll fix it. AramilFeraxa (talk) 16:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, that sort of thing can happen to any of us. A bit of a nerve for that editor to ask to be renamed. They stand pretty much zero chance of herring unblocked here. Thanks for your rapid response. Out of curiosity, where did they ask? Or shouldn’t I ask about it, although as a CU I am privy to confidential information. Doug Weller talk 16:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller I have undone the renaming, I hope everything is ok now. They asked about it on meta, but you need GR permissions to see the request. I apologise for the confusion. AramilFeraxa (talk) 16:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All ok now, cheeky of them to ask. Doug Weller talk 18:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]