User talk:ArchStanton69

Please Explain

Problem with John West Kinney? It's a biography. Please explain. Steve Kinney

You know that IP adress who edited Morty Black's page?

That was Morty himself. Cool, huh?Ollie the Magic Skater 01:05, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, cool! Just too bad that there is no page on me on Wiki that I can edit. Cheers, ArchStanton 18:14, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

FYI

{nonsense} and {db-nonsense} are exactly equivalent. In fact, I think one is just a redirect to the other, so there's no need to modify the tag. Fan-1967 16:28, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

OK, thanks for letting me know.

Your edits to Miran Burgic

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, ArchStanton69! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, and try to reinsert the link again. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 20:28, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Sorry mate, the bot screwed up because you inserted "example.com" along with the speedy template. Shadow1 (talk) 20:30, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Arnfinn Kjelland

Welcome!

Hello, ArchStanton69, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! 

It is always nice to see new folks active on Wikipedia. I used the standard welcome since I see no one took the trouble to say hi when you joined a few months back. You know much of that, but...

It is, however, quite rare for someone to enter Wikipedia with:

• 226 total edits as of this entry (per ArchStanton69 (talk • contribs • non-automated contribs • wikichecker • count • total • logs • page moves • block log • email))
• Few original contributions
• Greatest contributions to pop culture articles like Susanna and the Magical Orchestra which have little lasting merit.
• Most of ones time on Wikipedia spent in AfD.

and to start off one’s Wikipedia career with a campaign to delete articles that are borderline on meeting the Wikipedia:Notability (people) guidelines. Your prod ( {{dated prod|concern = {{{concern|reason Not notable, his publications are in Norwegian only, and are local history books for 4 Norwegian muncipalities}}}|month = January|day = 11|year = 2007|time = 16:39|timestamp = 20070111163949}}) on Arnfinn Kjelland is rather unusual.

I do strongly appreciate your notifying me; very much the civilized and right thing to do.

I don't intend to delete/contest your prod on the Arnfinn article. You're partially right, of course, the Kjelland article is not in the same class as the Churchill article & never will be. But I would suggest he easily meets the Wikipedia:Notability (people) (“the individual is more well known and more published than an average college professor”); I live on another continent, have never met the man, and am aware of his work. I've read enough of his work on historic Norwegian property law to consider him noteworthy enough to add to Wikipedia)—but if the article goes, it goes. He is a legitimate & serious author in an area of growing historic interest to a subset of the population (but all history is only of interest to a subset of the population).

Wikipedia is a relational database which can handle a large number of articles. Over the past 2 years the number has much more than doubled. The topics covered become ever more detailed. My bet is that we delete Arnfinn Kjelland today, in another two years we'll have Arnfinn Kjelland back.

I’d suggest that you refrain from working further AfD nominations (except for obvious trash which you've clearly helped with) until you’ve created some serious articles. Then you will be more than welcome to clean out other’s contributions.

Look forward to seeing more of your work! Skål - Williamborg (Bill) 05:59, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Apologies for expressing myself such that you felt patronized. Comments on your thoughtful and intelligent comments follow:

• Appreciate your reminding me that I can remove prods (I felt just a bit patronized by that observation myself, since I have removed a couple of prods over the years, but never on articles I initiated). As stated above, I do not intend to delete your prod on the Arnfinn article. If you elect to leave it and the admin who responds when the prod times-out elects to delete Arnfinn, so be it.
• Yes I may have overreacted. I have spent enough time in AfD space myself to recognize marketing, do not write promotional pieces for anyone, and felt offended that my material should have come across as a promotional piece. But if you felt it reads as promotional, I accept that I need to improve my work.
• My calling your adding a few prods a "campaign" was indeed harsh and judgemental. You're obviously intelligent and capable, so I should have assumed good faith. Please accept my apology for harsh wording.
• I am particularly heartened that you will broaden your focus to include increasing the number of articles on notable Norwegian people, with inclusion of Norwegian writers. If you checked my contributions and noted I've originated over a dozen of these articles (usually by poorly translating articles from the Norwegian Wiki), I appreciate your research and thoughtful comment. If you did it instinctively, since this is an area that (in my opinion) is worthy of improvement, that is even better. I sincerely welcome any efforts there.
• And as to "pop culture", I rather apologize for my lopsided view. I am old enough to have seen Bob Dylan in Dinkytown. In his generation there were hundreds & hundreds of other pop rock groups who would probably have been added to Wikipedia by the fans of that day if Wikipedia had existed then. And most of those groups have totally vanished, deservedly so. So yes, I do think there is a lot of Fancruft amongst that subset of Wiki articles. Early on I considered starting my own campaign to cull the weaker of these, but concluded that Wikipedia is a relational database with lots of space & Wikipedia would be better off if I let folks who contribute to popular culture police their own turf while I focused on adding material in areas that interest me.

It is a pleasure seeing you here in Wikipedia. Pleased that you didn't let a cranky, surly, crusty, old curmudgeon drive you away. Happy editing - Williamborg (Bill) 01:28, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

AFD now opened at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnfinn Kjelland. GRBerry 15:32, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

If you followed the process you are aware that the concensus agreed with your call—Arnfinn Kjelland has been deleted. Properly called & well done. Thanks for your patience and forebearance - Williamborg (Bill) 00:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Tony Stonem

I wasnt sure how to post a message to you. WHY DO YOU KEEP DELETING THE PAGE I AM CREATEING ON TONY STONEM???????????? my user name is KevGGrif — Preceding unsigned comment added by KevGGrif (talk • contribs)

Your username, something interesting...

Something funny about your username.... in Horrible Histories Wicked Words book there's a page with "ARCH STANTON WANTED FOR SPELLING 'COLOR' WITH A 'U' "

Oh well, if it makes Clint Eastwood's westerns cooler with the younger generation....

BTW, keep the good work up.... --sunstar net^talk 13:20, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Arnfinn Nesset

Hi, I saw you made an edit about Nesset. You claim he has changed his name and is prbably with the Salvation Army. That may well be, but have you found any evidence to support it? I too am a Norwegian. The Norwegian page doesn't mention this and I haven't seen any remarks about it in the press. --Teodor605 10:15, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Norwegian and The Man with no Name

Hey there! I too share you rlove of spaghetti westerns check out my extensive work on The Good, the Bad and the Ugly -I added the cast section and all the images and also started articles on all the actors e.g Lorenzo Robledo , Antonio Casale (a.k.a Bill Carson , Enzo Petito and Antonio Casas recognize them? Please could you help me by returning the favour in translating Aage Samuelsen. It would mean a lot to me. THanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"I've been expecting you"} 12:33, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a lot mate great I really appreciate it. It is an extreme coincindence but as I got the message I had just edited The Good the Bad and the Ugly adding the Italy cinema tag!! Cheers mate. Bill Carson. "A aawn off little runt like Tuco"!!! Thanks!

♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"I've been expecting you"} 19:02, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Have a look at Lorenzo Robledo. Remember he was the guy whose family were killed by El Indio in the second Dollars film For a Few Dollars More (1965). You like this film too? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"I've been expecting you"} 19:05, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Shambag

I didn't create the page, can I still delete the deletion notice? --User:garethppls^{User talk:garethppls (Talk)} 15:14, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits to Larry "LaPret" Pretlow

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, ArchStanton69! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bexample\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 14:04, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

User:King Logo

Don't delete my page, I am going to change it to make it more suitable. I now understand what is wrong with it. As for the User:Zuo Ci Chreat page, that will be changed too. I am working on it now. My page will be availiable to help students with revision.

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

Just thought I would stop by and recognize your great contribs:

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I, Katalaveno, award you, ArchStanton69, with the RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your tireless efforts to revert vandalism. KatalavenoTC 15:30, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Storholmen fyr.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Storholmen fyr.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. —Pilotguy cleared for takeoff 23:33, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Is Stanton a Norwegian name as well?

I am a Stanton, but in my case the name is Old English (Anglo-Saxon) for "stone town", a placename obviously. Just curious. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 23:39, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Your NPWatcher Application

Dear ArchStanton69,

Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.

Snowolf ^(talk) _CON ^COI - 11:31, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Blitblit16

I looked at his contributions and he did some in dealing with Marvel comics characters I googled them and this 11-Ball and others and they do exist. I put on his talk page he really needs to flesh out the articles and put exactly what they are about since he doesn't even mention they are comcic characters. Its up to you but if you'd like you could remove the warning since they are legit characters he just really doesn't get how to make the pages for them. I put a welcome template up as well to help him. Thanks for your time. --Xiahou 22:35, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Contaminated Cannabis

Good idea...a small footnote could even get by on the cannabis page. Jmlk17 18:51, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks you by the way for the suggestion. Jmlk17 18:53, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

AutoWikiBrowser

Thank you for your recent application to use AutoWikiBrowser. Regrettably, I have declined your request as you do not have 500 mainspace edits. You are welcome to apply again at a later time. Feel free to contact me with any questions, alphachimp 07:51, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, ArchStanton69! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego ^talk 20:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Whyd you say I vandalized the development disability page? I did no such of a thing. Please see the articles discussion for an explination of my edit.

Trying to improve upon article

You have totally removed or reverted an existing article on this artist, Joseph Wood. Why? There is little information out there available, and he is significant in the outsider art world. Please, why the change--I was making only minor edits to correct what I found. The artist you have reverted to is not regarded as significant in history--nor in the world of art as known today (1700s?) Whereas, "this" Joseph Wood (1977) has a piece going into the Silverstein Building at Ground Zero. Get my drift? MortonMumps 16 May, 2007 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Habitsofstyle (talk • contribs)

Vandalism

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my userpage! Royalbroil 12:38, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Hot chip over and over.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Hot chip over and over.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Letmeintroducemyfriends.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Letmeintroducemyfriends.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Reversions / Newpage patrol

Thank you for your efforts. You could help out a little more by also leaving the relevant warning template on the offenders talkpages. That way repeat offenders will be taken care of far faster. Agathoclea 14:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

oh im sorry i didnt realise i wasnt allowed to write that ill fix it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by K936 (talk • contribs) 13:44, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Unit4agresso logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Unit4agresso logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:53, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Listsoflightsandbuoyssusanna.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Listsoflightsandbuoyssusanna.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Susannamagical.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Susannamagical.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 14:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikimania 2010 could be coming to Stockholm!

I'm leaving you a note as you may be interested in this opportunity.

People from all six Nordic Wiki-communities (sv, no, nn, fi, da and is) are coordinating a bid for Wikimania 2010 in Stockholm. I'm sending you a message to let you know that this is occurring, and over the next few months we're looking for community support to make sure this happens! See the bid page on meta and if you like such an idea, please sign the "supporters" list at the bottom. Tack (or takk), and have a wonderful day! Mike H. Fierce! 11:02, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Unit 4

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Unit 4, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Unit 4 Agresso. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:27, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

The bot is right, you shouldn't have copied and pasted the page. There is a move button at the top of each article for changing its title. However no harm no foul: I will tag this article for an admin to fix this for us. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 15:44, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:16, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)