User talk:Ascendionofficial

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Ascendionofficial, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Ascendionofficial, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Uhai (talk · contribs) 20:37, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ascendionofficial[edit]

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Ascendionofficial, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Uhai (talk · contribs) 20:37, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Kinu ^t/_c 20:53, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ascendionofficial (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Ascendion (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

We are not here to get any compensation. We understand the reason for our block that we promoted to much and will not repeat this kind of edits for which I am blocked. I intend to make comments and impactful additions on other users page, while also spreading meeaningful infromation through my own page.

Decline reason:

You have not proposed a new username as instructed. Accounts are strictly single person use only, and the username must indicate that(your real name is not required and even discouraged). A username in the format of "JohnDoe of Ascendion" would be acceptable. Please designate a single person to exclusively operate this account and who will give no one else access. If you work for the company, that is considered paid editing, you do not have to be specifically paid for edits. You won't be unblocked to merely edit user talk pages, and your own user talk page is for communication with you only. If you have edits you wish to make to the encyclopedia that are not about your company or its field, please tell what those might be. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 15:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry I am just confused as I have never made a wikipedia page before, did not mean to go against the guidelines of Wikipedia. Ascendionofficial (talk) 17:10, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Again I did not know that the username had to be under one person's name as I have not made an account in Wikipedia before. Ascendionofficial (talk) 16:32, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ascendionofficial (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why I was blocked. I was not aware of the rules, and after I read them over I understand the username policy and that you can not have a company name in it. I was trying to create an account, but I did it without knowing how to and did not understand what the talk page was for. I never had the intention of disrupting wikipedia's guidelines as I will not do it again. I have thoroughly reviewed the policys of wikipedia and if given the chance, I will change my username to a single person. Ascendionofficial (talk) 16:39, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You forgot to pick a new username. You forgot to convince us you understand WP:PAID. You forgot to tell us what you'd write about instead, if unblocked. Yamla (talk) 17:31, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ascendionofficial (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why I have been blocked. I am new to wikipedia once again and did not know how to work it. I have learned and instead if unblocked, I will write about the history of the company Ascendion and what the company is. My new username would be my name in some form, Cwhalen110, and lastly I understand Wikipedia Paid and I am not getting paid in any way when contributing to wikipedia. Ascendionofficial (talk) 13:38, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:22, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you work for the company, you are a paid editor. You do not have to be specifically paid for edits. We aren't interested in what the company considers to be its own history; we are interested in what independent reliable sources say is the company history. Someone else will review your request, but this is unlikely to succeed. 331dot (talk) 15:33, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]