User talk:Atl201

This user is a student editor in Medical_University_of_South_Carolina_-_MUSC/WikiProject_Medicine_-_Medical_Writing_(Fall_2018) .

Atl201, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Atl201! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Foreign body aspiration— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:45, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I edited the caption of the image to let the reader know what they are looking at on xray. The previous caption was much less specific. Atl201 (talk) 20:54, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 10th Meeting- Weekly Summary

This past week I worked primarily on adding hyperlinks to my article. I tried to make sure I added hyperlinks to all subjects that the general public would possibly want more information about. I made sure the hyperlinks I added directed the reader to a relevant article on the subject. This process was not as difficult as I expected it to be.
I also worked this weekend on submitting my peer review of my assigned article- colorectal polyps. I went through the peer review module and tried to work through the article addressing each aspect the module touched on. I wrote my peer review section by section of the article the author had updated to hopefully make it clear which part of the article I was referring to. This process was helpful for me when looking at my own article to realize things I may need to edit or work on a bit more. The article I reviewed had some great new information added to the article and really did not need too much work. The sources the author used were good secondary medical sources from reputable medical textbooks. I left my peer review on the author's sandbox and on their talk page- I was somewhat unsure of where exactly to leave my peer review so I left it in both of these places.Atl201 (talk) 03:15, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]