User talk:Auggyp

December 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Austin Petersen has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Austin Petersen was changed by Auggyp (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2015-12-25T03:58:57+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:58, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Austin Petersen. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --BurritoBazooka (talk) 05:31, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if that message wasn't clear, please stop asserting your opinion through edits, you should instead talk it out with the other party. --BurritoBazooka (talk) 05:54, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Austin Petersen article

My paragraph that you keep deleting in the Austin Petersen article has two reputable sources attached, including an article by Austin Petersen himself, as well as the platform of the Libertarian Party, which mentions the non-aggression principles exactly ten times. Your deletions contain no reasoning. Please stop. Thank you. Jeff Smith (talk) 05:53, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Austin Petersen. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Austin Petersen was changed by Auggyp (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2015-12-27T03:11:29+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:11, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Austin Petersen

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Austin Petersen without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Caballero/Historiador (talk) 19:31, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You continue with disruptive editing here: Austin Petersen. Please, stop and follow instructions. Caballero/Historiador (talk) 20:16, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia.

December 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Austin Petersen. This is your last warning. Please, stop reverting and follow guidelines for contribution to this article. Caballero/Historiador (talk) 20:18, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Caballero/Historiador (talk) 20:48, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015 2

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:30, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You've also been reported at the edit warring noticeboard (permalink). A rather new account, such as yours, that seems to be on Wikipedia only to edit war on one topic is unlikely to be tolerated here much longer. Please consider your options. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:58, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Austin Petersen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Austin Petersen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austin Petersen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 20:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

stop it

You have got to stop adding unsourced content to Austin Petersen, like changing "atheist" to "agnostic" and so forth. I realize you probably have first-hand knowledge of his religious and other disposition but that's irrelevant in the absence of a third-party source. Simply repeatedly pounding the "undo" key is going to lead to you getting indeffed. LavaBaron (talk) 05:24, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For the last time, stop changing someone's religious affiliation without RS. The blog "dueling politics" is not RS. You've been warned by User:EdJohnston and User:Caballero1967 and blocked by User:Boing! said Zebedee. What is it going to take? LavaBaron (talk) 19:22, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Smartyllama (talk) 19:15, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]