User talk:AugmentedFire

Welcome!

Hello, AugmentedFire, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like WormWood (band), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Amalthea 02:12, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gears of war 3

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gears of war 3, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

A rumor

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Schuym1 (talk) 02:30, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of WormWood (band)

A tag has been placed on WormWood (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Adolphus79 (talk) 02:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page WormWood (band) has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links: http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=400076821).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:10, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article WormWood (band) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. FreplySpang 02:15, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:31WTDDY0XTL. SL500 AA300 .jpg

Thanks for uploading File:31WTDDY0XTL. SL500 AA300 .jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:31WTDDY0XTL._SL500_AA300_.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:31WTDDY0XTL._SL500_AA300_.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 17:48, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zonies

The article Zonies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet Wikipedia notability criteria. See WP:CORP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pink Bull 03:56, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Justin Bieber, you will be blocked from editing. Tbh®tch^Talk ^© Happy Holidays 05:10, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for I can't quite decide if this account if a vandalism-only account, or the recent edits indicate it has been compromised, but either is worthy of an indef block.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Courcelles 03:41, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AugmentedFire (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made edits that were not cited, and will no longer do so. All contributions that follow will be strictly in a productive manner. Also, if a username change is possible, it would be appreciated.Firecrotch979 (talk) 09:07, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

From my perspective, edits such as this are vandalism, but your block request is written as if the problem is not providing references. PhilKnight (talk) 11:48, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

AugmentedFire (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes, that one post is considered "vandalism," but it was also me messing around in High School. The rest have all said something about no citations. Am I wrong? "did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia." I made one edit that was considered "vandalism," and it gets me banned completely? At the top is says it's a warning, and then all of a sudden I can't post or edit topics... This is not a "vandalism-only" account, as it was presumed to be for very little clear reason ("I can't quite decide if this account if a vandalism-only account, or the recent edits indicate it has been compromised, but either is worthy of an indef block.."). Also, how long will this be on hold for?Firecrotch979 (talk) 22:17, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Accept reason:

(This unblock request was put on hold, but is now superseded by the one below.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:04, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per Courcelles, we can unblock you if you are also willing to change your username as well. Use {{unblock-un}} to propose a new one. Daniel Case (talk) 23:27, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

AugmentedFire (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

AugmentedFire (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Looking for more appropriate/mature name Firecrotch979 (talk) 23:29, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Accept reason:

After nearly four years, I am willing to believe you are likely to have grown out of the silly sort of thing that is linked to above. I am unblocking you to allow a username change to the requested username. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking, and I hope from now on you can be a constructive contributor to the encyclopaedia. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:04, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Chris Von Erich

Greetings, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I just reverted your edit, because you did not provide any reliable sources for your change. If you find such a source, you are most welcome to reinstate it. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 00:06, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]