User talk:Aulj7

Welcome!

Hi Aulj7! I noticed your contributions to V/Line N class and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Hockeycatcat (talk) 10:39, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

One Rail Australia edits

Hi, I was going through the One Rail Australia page looking to update it, and got a notification that you had already edited some of it. I am open to having a discussion so that we don't end up cancelling each others edits. Cheers MatthewH01 (talk) 11:05, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi, thanks. What do you know? I know that Aurizon took over SA/NT operations from today, ORA no longer exists as a standalone company, with ECR currently being managed separately 'as it was' under Aurizon until they get rid of it Aulj7 (talk) 11:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Having added the ORN class, don't you need to delete the GWA class from the table? I'm not intimately familiar with the fleet so I could be wrong, but I see 51 locos were acquired, not 55. Cheers -- SCHolar44 (talk) 14:05, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

4 GWA classes have supposedly been allocated to ECR, and will be transferred soon enough. Reliable sources have confirmed this to me. ORN class are brand new locos ordered from the US for narrow gauge coal usage. Aulj7 (talk) 23:16, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

These ORN classes have already entered service btw.

The GWAs are not yet running with ECR as they have all been in SA since they were delivered. Aulj7 (talk) 23:22, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. Sorry, but whereas it would be of interest in a chat group, it doesn't meet Wikipedia's requirement for verifiability (i.e. all content must be verifiable, see 1st paragraph in Wikipedia:Verifiability). Is there a reliable, third party published source available? I expect not, given that this deals with something that only occurred 3 days ago. See Wikipedia:Recentism. I'd recommend reversing your edit until there is such a source, which you can cite. I know it can be very frustrating when reliable unpublished sources can give a true picture that published sources can't (or can't yet) -- I'm no stranger there -- but Wikipedia's policies are clear. Cheers, SCHolar44 (talk) 00:07, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

I did not make the table. I only added the ORN part. There are plenty of photos of the ORNs and you can find them by searching "One Rail Australia ORN Locomotive" and going to Images. If you want to pay for sh*tty "journalism" you can search up the Courier Mail's article about it. Aulj7 (talk) 00:28, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

I knew you didn't make the table, and never suggested you did. I'm not interested in photos, and didn't mention them. I'm also not interested in looking up a reference -- that's what you should have done when you added the information, unless you're saying there's a paywall. SCHolar44 (talk) 01:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Okay. I wasn't sure what you were referring to. Yes I was saying there was an annoying paywall. A photo is just as good of proof as anything. I told you to look up the reference because it wouldn't let me paste the link in here. Aulj7 (talk) 02:33, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

June 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Fork99 (talk) 01:51, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Does it really matter that much? I always provide references, multiple if possible, on major edits and the summary just seems like a waste of time when the edit is usually pretty self-explanatory. Aulj7 (talk) 02:06, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

I’m of the opinion that it really helps out other editors when you do. Even something as simple as “added info about x” or “fixed spelling” is good enough. I highly encourage and recommend it, as other editors may like to check what you’ve done, but if you do multiple edits in a row without explaining yourself, for example, it can be really time consuming to check them one by one. Fork99 (talk) 05:06, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Yeah okay. Makes sense. I shall add summaries from now on. :) Aulj7 (talk) 05:08, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Pleasure doing business with ya :) Fork99 (talk) 05:12, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Loco fleet status tables

Hi, I saw you were re-adding status tables for locomotive articles. It’s been decided at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian Transport that these tables are against Wikipedia policy unless they are properly cited with reliable sources, i.e. no original research is needed. It’s better to just generalise this sort of info in prose form and leave the nitty gritty details for rail enthusiast forums, Facebook groups and websites.

Please feel free to have a look around this new WikiProject as well, and consider placing your name on the list of members/participants if you’re interested. Thanks! Fork99 (talk) 03:57, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Well that’s dumb. I only did it for the XRs given it didn’t have one and it used to. Given every other locomotive type in Australia has it on their page. Unfortunately people might not be able to cite their sources, like myself — my source is from a driver who helped oversee the XR project - but the information is still accurate. Reducing the amount of information available on a page is silly in my opinion. You’d be hard pressed to find blatantly incorrect information on those tables. I do them on Wikipedia because similar areas on Vicsig and others are no longer consistently updated. Without the status table the page is essentially a stub. There is very little citable, information out there. Aulj7 (talk) 04:06, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Sorry but don’t take this up with me, take this up with the WikiProject in addition to the general Wikipedia community. These are hard and fast guidelines that Wikipedia articles are based on. Per WP:NOR, Wikipedia articles must not contain original research. On Wikipedia, original research means material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published source exists. North American and European locomotive articles almost never have status tables because of Wikipedia’s guidelines. See EMD F40PH for a North American example, which is rated by the Wikipedia community as a good article. There is information out there published in books and magazine issues that can help. Fork99 (talk) 04:19, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

I really don’t care. You don’t have to go and delete an hours worth of work that I did for the benefit of others. It’s not going to kill you to leave it there, is it? This is precisely how to piss someone off into not contributing anything to this dumb website again. Aulj7 (talk) 04:22, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

1. I don’t have anything against your information which I believe to be accurate.

2. You don’t have to contribute to Wikipedia, no one is forcing you to.

3. The information you added can be added if cited correctly. I’m fairly certain there are magazine issues by Motive Power, books by the Australian Railway Historical Society among other sources that have this sort of info. Unfortunately, yes not all sorts of information, but it’s a good start.

4. I didn’t appreciate you calling me a “snobby do-gooder” in your edit summary (diff). Please read up on the Wikipedia policy on personal attacks against other editors. Fork99 (talk) 04:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

It is precisely because I am volunteering myself to improve the information on the site that I am annoyed that the information is being removed. Every other locomotive class in Australia has a status table, and I don't think that should change. I do not care what the "rules" say. I have since added two Vicsig links at the top that contain photos that were used for the dates I gave. The links also contain information that supports what I have added. Aulj7 (talk) 05:01, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

National Rail NR class no longer has a fleet table, and that isn’t by my hand. Just because other articles still retain their tables doesn’t mean that they should remain in the state that they are. As I’ve said, please take this up with the Australian transport editor community at the discussion page at WikiProject Australian Transport. Fork99 (talk) 05:18, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Aulj7! Your additions to Red Cliffs Secondary College have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)