User talk:AuroraANovaUma

Welcome!

Hello, AuroraANovaUma, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:58, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page DALL-E, but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. In articles about text-to-image models, examples should connect to the text and illustrate specific aspects of the technology or its cultural usage, as much as possible. Arbitrary cartoons without prompts don't add much to that. Belbury (talk) 17:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok AuroraANovaUma (talk) 17:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I liked your user page =)

Hello @AuroraANovaUma.

I liked soo much your user page, the Wikipedia logo bounces in stickman head, that's fun. Vitorperrut555 (talk) 18:48, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thx ^^ AuroraANovaUma (talk) 20:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome =D Vitorperrut555 (talk) 16:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Autistic v with Austism

I have to admit that I much prefer "with Autism". At some level I think it is better to not essentize conditions. I think it is better to say someone has diabetes than that they are dialectic, but I do not see it as a big deal. My main objection is "autistic" gets pronounced by some too like "artistic". "With autism" gets pronounced correctly, and leads yo less confusion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

alr. but anyway, thx for sharing your thoughts. personally, i couldnt care less what happens and i dont mind either to be used AuroraANovaUma (talk) 14:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Baldi.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Baldi.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roblox game screenshot.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Roblox game screenshot.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i nominated my own file for discussion AuroraANovaUma ^-^ (talk) 14:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Taiwan

Wikipedia tends to combine the political country in this case ROC with its geography Taiwan, so we had a discussion and there was no consensus that the wording island country is supported in the first sentence. Many sources still do not call Taiwan by itself a country, and there are also disagreements over whether ROC legally owns Taiwan or not or if it's still the old China or a different one, so no change was made. CurryCity (talk) 20:33, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok... AuroraANovaUma ^-^ (talk) 22:55, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The only reason why I put it there btw is because most of the articles for island countries, including those that are de jure nations, use the term "island country" at the first sentence. Taiwan's article is also in Category:Island countries. I honestly don't believe the article having that there would argue about Taiwan's sovereignty in any way but that's only in my eyes. AuroraANovaUma ^-^ (talk) 23:05, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We're more careful with the main article because it contains a lot of historical and political information unique to Taiwan. Lists and categories may care more about geography. CurryCity (talk) 18:58, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]