User talk:Avoncycle

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 4)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

David.moreno72 08:53, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Avoncycle! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 08:53, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: User:Avoncycle/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Avoncycle/sandbox. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 08:56, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:Avoncycle/sandbox

Your user page, User:Avoncycle/sandbox, has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be advertising which only promoted or publicized someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 331dot (talk) 09:59, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. 331dot (talk) 10:00, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Avoncycle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am new on wikipedia i don't know the policies.please unblock me i will remove that content and improve my content.

Decline reason:

You forgot to pick a new username. You forgot to address your apparent violations of WP:COI and WP:PROMO. You forgot to tell us what you'd write about, now that you know you won't be unblocked to write about Avon Cycle. Yamla (talk) 11:31, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have fixed your request for proper display(instead of overwriting it within the block notice, you must highlight and copy the template when viewing this page, then open the edit window and paste it outside the block notice). If you don't know our policies, you should probably take some time to review at least the ones I bring up in the block notice before requesting unblock. 331dot (talk) 10:22, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Please unblock my Account. I am not promoting the Brand. I only post an article for Avon Cycle. I read the policies now i will not use brand name again.— Preceding unsigned comment added by AvonCycle (talk • contribs)

Again, you need to place your comments outside the block notice, not overwrite it. You also only need one open request, subsequent comments should be standard comments like this one I am writing. 331dot (talk) 11:22, 4 February 2020 (UTC)