User talk:Community Constructivist
Welcome
[edit]
|
April 2012
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I noticed that your username (Awslaw) may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because your username represents a group or organization. Per: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/A.W. Smith Law Building. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account to use for editing. Thank you. Pol430 talk to me 21:45, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/A.W. Smith Law Building.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! tausif 06:57, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
A.W. Smith Law Building
[edit]Hi,
I appreciate your efforts on correcting and re-submitting the article. Well, I have noted two or three instances where the article slides away from its track or facts mentioned without proper reference.
- He grew up on a small farm near Blackwater, Missouri in Cooper County before attending the University of Missouri and moving to Columbia. A.W. Smith volunteers his time to Big Brothers Big Sisters of Columbia and handles pro bono cases throughout the year.
- Allegedly, the old and tarnished Mizzou flag that once hung from the front porch of the old brick house is well remembered among Mizzou alumni. There is a rumor that the old Mizzou flag was retained and will be kept in the new office building on display as a piece of memorabilia. A.W.
Also, please use an infobox for the article. Refer here for the help Template:Infobox_building.
Further, you may also get an idea for creating this article by referring to the article:Empire State Building.
Looking forward for changes,
tausif 06:16, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/A.W. Smith Law Building.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 01:10, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
The article A.W. Smith Law Building has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This is clearly a paid advertisement dressed up to look like a notable building (it's not) in order to hoodwink Wikipedians into believing the article meets WP:Notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Grey Wanderer (talk) 19:11, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
July 2019
[edit]Hello Community Constructivist. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to A.W. Smith Law Building, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Community Constructivist. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Community Constructivist|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Grey Wanderer (talk) 19:14, 13 July 2019 (UTC)