User talk:Axelamer

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Axelamer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I never tried to edit any article, but now I have to do it about the "Chief Innovation Office" for a coursework so please unblock meAxelamer (talk) 20:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Then do so. If there is a block impacting your account, I cannot see it. You will need to provide the message you are receiving when you are prevented from editing. Kuru (talk) 23:48, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2014

Hello, I'm Brycehughes. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Chief innovation officer without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Brycehughes (talk) 15:23, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Stesmo. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Chief innovation officer because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Stesmo (talk) 21:42, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chief innovation officer may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:40, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Axelamer. You have new messages at Stesmo's talk page.
Message added 00:40, 24 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chief innovation officer. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chief innovation officer was changed by Axelamer (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950567 on 2014-10-24T20:28:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:28, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chief innovation officer. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Brycehughes (talk) 04:04, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chief innovation officer, you may be blocked from editing. Stesmo (talk) 18:31, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]