User talk:Båt of Hopps

February 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Raghib Pasha—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:24, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I'm issuing you a proper warning this time. Stop adding your disruptive short descriptions, and review the guidelines/ ~ Eejit43 (talk) 20:09, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jacobson's conjecture, you may be blocked from editing. Stop adding inappropriate short descriptions. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 20:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Eejit43 ohh I am really sorry 😔 I'll watch for next time Båt of Hopps (talk) 20:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Båt of Hopps please read the messages in the other section, you need to review the short description guidelines. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 20:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at De Goede Hoop Hostel. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 20:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Eejit43 plz tell me in video format so that I can understand

the disrupting edits

can you help me plz Båt of Hopps (talk) 20:38, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Båt of Hopps No, I cannot.

I will repeat what I said below:

"I don't intend to be rude in saying this, but it seems like English might not be your first language. If so, you should instead edit on the Wikipedia for your native language if you wish." ~ Eejit43 (talk) 20:39, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Eejit43 ok than I will Båt of Hopps (talk) 20:42, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Short descriptions

Thank you for adding Short descriptions to articles. However, many of these descriptions have been much too long – the current guidelines at WP:SDSHORT advise a limit of around 40 characters. Please read the full guidelines at WP:SDCONTENT — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 20:08, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Båt of Hopps stop, your edits are beginning to become disruptive as each one needs to be changed. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 03:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GhostInTheMachine I am trying to resolve my mistake Båt of Hopps (talk) 20:13, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Båt of Hopps you should almost never copy text directly from the lead section, it should really always be reworded. I've reverted all of your short description additions today. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 20:15, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Eejit43 thankful to you Båt of Hopps (talk) 20:16, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Båt of Hopps I don't intend to be rude in saying this, but it seems like English might not be your first language. If so, you should instead edit on the Wikipedia for your native language if you wish. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 20:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Båt of Hopps I really don't know how many times I have to bring this up, please go over the guidelines. Important things to note are WP:SDNONE and WP:SDAVOID. You also aren't writing in proper English in many of them, and they don't summarize the topic whatsoever. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 20:34, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing (assuming good faith). You do not currently appear to have the necessary proficiency to edit the English Wikipedia. As others have said, I would suggest you edit the Wikipedia in your native language.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 20:54, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamzin unblock|reason= I had given my account to a freelancer who had to complete me 50 edits for me on Upwork so plz if there is any way you can restore my account for blocking

thank you

Syed Muhammad

Båt of Hopps (talk) 21:02, 9 February 2023 (UTC)}}. --[reply]

@Tamzin You did not gave me reply on my situation please help me out.

And give my account one last chance.

Sincerely

Syed Muhammad

Båt of Hopps Båt of Hopps (talk) 21:14, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]