User talk:BBCjj11

BBCjj11, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi BBCjj11! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Ethnic groups in the United Kingdom , but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:58, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Again... Please stop adding unsourced claims to articles. They will be removed. You must provide a reliable published source for your claims - per Wikipedia's policies on no original research, reliable sources, etc. Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:15, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have you actually read the guidelines I suggested? It doesn't matter whether you think your claims are right or wrong. What matters is that they are not substantiated from reliable published sources. Unless you say where you got your information from, your claims will be deleted. Please also read the guidance on edit warring, and don't do it. Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:38, 18 December 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Yes, thanks for the the help. I read it. Would it be possible if I could post their estimates with (OR)? but only with further details after finding a way of publishing a source if I was able to.— Preceding unsigned comment added by BBCjj11 (talk) 09:51, 18 December 2012‎

It's your responsibility, in adding material to any article, to provide a reliable, previously published, source showing where you got the information. You should not add information without a source. Other editors will come along and either delete the material you've added, or, perhaps, add a ^{[citation needed]} tag to it, to show that it is unsourced. You shouldn't do that yourself though - you should provide the source. Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:17, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still not sure that you understand. It is not up to you to publish your findings. It is up to someone else - a reliable, published source, such as a book or a newspaper - to set out the information. Then, and only then, should it be reported in an article. The way to edit is certainly not to include what you think is true, and then find sources to back you up. It is to read the sources, and then include the information in an article. You seem to be going about editing in entirely the wrong way. Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:00, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: And when you leave messages for other people, please remember to sign them using four of these: ~ Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:02, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PPS: If you wish to question information already contained in an article, you should raise your concerns on the article talk page, to discuss it with other editors, rather than taking unilateral action yourself. Please read WP:SIGHOW. Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:39, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Ghanaians in the United Kingdom, you may be blocked from editing. Tmol42 (talk) 20:32, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at African immigration to Europe, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tmol42 (talk) 20:35, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ghmyrtle did you get my message? I seems to of been deleted? BBCjj11 (talk) 20:21, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]