User talk:Bakerbaker525

Bakerbaker525, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Bakerbaker525! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

May 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Matteson, Illinois, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:56, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I said it was inaccurate information. How does one be clearer than that? The info was not true. Bakerbaker525 (talk) 07:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unjustified statement. If this edit summary was valid, you could remove any information, claiming that there are "some inaccuracies". Materialscientist (talk) 07:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why don’t you tell me exactly what you’d like me to say when I remove the information that is fake. Please share with me how I can be constructive when challenging dishonesty. Bakerbaker525 (talk) 07:55, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You must justify why it is incorrect. Otherwise, your account will be blocked very soon for technical reasons. Materialscientist (talk) 08:01, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, do you work for Wikipedia? I’m not sure what form of higher education you do or do not have, but one cannot justify something that is blatantly not true. Please don’t threaten me, that’s not very professional. Bakerbaker525 (talk) 08:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is simple: we have a NYT sources making a clear statement that is cited in the article. You're removing it merely because you believe NYT is wrong. You must provide strong multiple sources justifying your removal. Otherwise, cease and desist. Materialscientist (talk) 08:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

cease and desist with your harassment of me. Do not message me again. Bakerbaker525 (talk) 12:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Matteson, Illinois, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Matteson, Illinois, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 12:18, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:18, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Listen you uneducated prima Donna, I’m not intimidated by your misuse of words. Get a life. I’ll just make another account. Bakerbaker525 (talk) 12:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]